Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 2062  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 627-630  

Complement receptor 1 (CR1)/ CD35+ expression analysis of salivary neutrophils on Streptococcus mutans phagocytosis


1 Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia
2 Department of Immunology and Physiology, Faculty of Sciences, Brawijaya University, Veteran, Malang, Java, Indonesia

Date of Web Publication27-May-2020

Correspondence Address:
Muhammad Luthfi
Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Airlangga University, Jl. Mayjend. Prof. Dr. Moestopo 47, Surabaya
Indonesia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_900_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) is a form of dental caries which is very destructive in early childhood since involving several teeth, include the maxillary anterior teeth. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) play an etiological integral role of ECC so that S. mutans are considered as the predictor of dental caries. The neutrophil is a key component of the rst line of defense against microbial invasion. The essential function of neutrophil is to kill pathogenic microbes through a phagocytosis process which is mediated by Complement Receptor 1 (CR1)/ (CD35+). Aims and Objectives: To analyze the phagocytosis process of the salivary neutrophil which is mediated by innate immunity component, i.e., Complement Receptor 1/CR1 (CD35) on S-ECC. Materials and Methods: his study was an observational analysis with cross-sectional approach using t-test analysis. This study employed the isolation steps of neutrophils saliva of caries-free children and the S-ECC and then conducted phagocytosis of salivary neutrophils test on S. mutans mediated by CD35 using ow cytometry. Results: Phagocytosis of salivary neutrophils on S. mutans mediated by CD35 on caries-free (2.35 ± 0.56) is higher than that on the S-ECC (1.54 ± 0.35). Conclusions: It is concluded that there is a decrease of phagocytic on S. mutans mediated by Complement Receptor 1/CR1 (CD35+) on S-ECC.

Keywords: CD35+, phagocytosis, salivary neutrophils, severe early childhood caries


How to cite this article:
Luthfi M, Indrawati R, Oki AS, Rifa'i M. Complement receptor 1 (CR1)/ CD35+ expression analysis of salivary neutrophils on Streptococcus mutans phagocytosis. Contemp Clin Dent 2019;10:627-30

How to cite this URL:
Luthfi M, Indrawati R, Oki AS, Rifa'i M. Complement receptor 1 (CR1)/ CD35+ expression analysis of salivary neutrophils on Streptococcus mutans phagocytosis. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 15];10:627-30. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2019/10/4/627/285038




   Introduction Top


Dental caries in preschool children denotes a crucial health problem. The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry declared caries as a serious disease as it is a chronic infection involving Streptococcus mutans which may be transmitted vertically from caregivers to the child.[1] Dental caries may have rapid and dynamic progress on both fully or partially erupted deciduous teeth that may arise pain, acute and chronic abscesses, fever, and swelling of the lips, leading to the decrease of appetite.[2] Dental caries is not a noxious disease yet requires a special attention as it is a focal infection that may facilitate various systemic diseases. The damage of tooth surface by carious lesion is irreversible; therefore, immediate treatment is necessary since it has tremendous impact on children, such as impaired mastication, malnutrition, gastrointestinal disorder, growth disorder (especially weight and height), articulation of speech, impaired social development, and cognitive disorder. Thus, for children, caries is a matter of health that has a long-term effect in later life.[1],[3] Besides, dental caries can cause psychological distress and it may lead to death if left untreated.[4]

Currently, the scientific reports have found the other role of neutrophils, that is, as a key component of the first line of defense against microbes.[5] Besides killing microbes through phagocytosis and releasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and anti-microbial peptides, neutrophils also help to set up the activation of immune responses.[6] Furthermore, neutrophil produces various number of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors that makes it as a major contributor to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the area of infection.[7]

Neutrophil recognizes pathogen molecules as peptidoglycan, lipoprotein, lipoteichoic acid, lipopolysaccharide, and flagellin. These molecules are called pathogen molecular-associated patterns (PAMPs), interacting with pattern recognition receptors family expressed on the neutrophils' surface, namely toll-like receptors (TLRs). The binding of PAMPs with TLRs, especially TLR 2 and 4, leads to the activation of the signal transduction pathway. This causes enhancement of various neutrophil functions, including adhesion, phagocytosis, cell viability, release of cytokines and chemokines, production of ROS, and degranulation. Although TLRs play an important role in the recognition of microbe by neutrophils, phagocytosis is more efficient when the microbe is coated with host proteins in the form of serum called opsonin. This opsonin includes protein complement and antibodies. The activation of complement causes sedimentation of complement components on the surface of the microbes. Complement component includes CIQ, C3b, and iC3b. The complement receptor (CR) surface is expressed on the neutrophil's surface, one of which is CR1 (CD35), efficiently recognizing the microbe bound with CR.[8],[9]

Based on the above explanation, this research aims to analyze the phagocytosis process of the salivary neutrophil which is mediated by innate immunity component, i.e., Complement Receptor 1/CR1 (CD35) on severe early childhood caries (S-ECC).

Materials and Methods

This research was approved by the institutional ethical committee, with certificate No. 01/KKEPK/VII/2013, and a signed consent form was acquired from the parent prior collecting the data.

Sampling

The sample was obtained from a number of selected kindergarten schools in Surabaya area. The examination of dental caries was conducted in each selected school by measuring the def-t index. Next, the subjects who had been examined were divided into two groups: caries-free group and caries group with def-t more than 6. The age of all subjects ranged from 4 to 6 years old at the time of examination.

Prior to the specimen collection, questionnaires were distributed and the parents respectively signed a sheet of written informed consent. The sample was obtained by researchers and trained personals using a standard protocol. Subjects should not eat, drink, chew gum, or brush teeth 60 min before sampling. The samples were then frozen (Frozen, Quanzhou, China) at a temperature of −80o C for further analysis.

Isolation of salivary neutrophils

Neutrophils in saliva were obtained by instructing the subjects to rinse their mouth with 10 ml of sterile 1.5% NaCl for 30 s but not swallow it. Then, it was expectorated in a sterile glass (Pyrex, Singapore). This procedure was repeated for four times. The collected specimens were subsequently centrifuged at 450 g for 15 min at 4°C. The pellet of centrifugation results was mixed with 2 ml of RPMI medium. After that, the samples were vortexed and were then filtered sequentially with 20 and 11 μm of nylon filter (Sheboygan WI, USA).[10]

Identification of salivary neutrophils

The identification of neutrophil used the sorting cell of human neutrophils enrichment kit (EasySep®, Sheboygan, WI, USA) with the following methods:

Nucleated cell suspension at a concentration of 5 × 107 mL was placed in a 5 mL (12 mm × 75 mm) polystyrene tube (EasySep®, St louis MO, USA) magnet, which is 5 ml polystyrene Tube (Falcon™, Becton Dickinson, catalog #352058). Then, EasySep® Cocktail neutrophil was added at 50 cells μL/mL (e.g. for 2 mL cells, add 100 μL cocktail). The solution was mixed well and incubated at room temperature or 4°C for 10 min. Next, EasySep® Nanoparticles were mixed to ensure that the cells were in a homogeneous suspension by pipetting more than five times. Vortexing is not recommended. Nanoparticles were added to 100 cells μL/mL (e.g. for 2 mL cells, add 200 μL of nanoparticles). The suspension was then mixed well and incubated at room temperature or 4°C for 10 min. Afterward, the cell suspension to a total volume of 2.5 mL the tube (without cap) was placed on the magnet and left for 5 min. The next stage was lifting the EasySep® Magnet in one continuous motion to reverse the magnet and the tube. The undesirable cells on the labeled magnet will remain bound in the original tube. The magnet and the tube were kept in an inverted position for 2–3 s before they were returned to the upright position. Any drops that may remain hanging from the mouth of the tube should not be shaken or removed. After that, the empty tube was released from the EasySep® magnet. A new tube containing supernatant fraction was then put to the magnet and left for 5 min. Thus, the cells in the new tube were ready for use.

The suspension analysis of cytometry cell flow was performed on activated fluorescence FACScan Cell Analyzer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). At least 25,000 events were analyzed for each saliva sample. Initially, neutrophils were gated by forward scatter (FSC), side scatter (SSC) profiles based on its size and granularity on neutrophil suspension. The gated cells were then analyzed. Positive coloring for the neutrophil marker was defined as events exceeding fluorescence level. Neutrophils which were over 70% of the isotype matched with the staining control were the ones to be studied. The percentage of neutrophil was determined by reducing positive coloration cells isotype matched from positive staining cell antibody. The percentage of worthy neutrophil was determined by gating on both negative cells propidium iodide and labeled fluorescent cell. Back-gating to FSC compared to SSC plot was conducted to verify the morphology of positive stained cells.

Measurement of expression carboxyfluorescein N-hydroxysuccinimide ester CD35+

In the process of phagocytosis, the surface receptor on phagocytic cells can bind to the fragment constant region (Fc) fragment from one type of immunoglobulin or may bind to complement factor (C3b). The interaction triggers a conformational change of the cytoskeleton to help the process of antigen ingestion. Pathogens are killed by the action of oxidative and nonoxidative mediators, i.e., the interaction between the complement factor of C3b or iC3b with complement receptor (CD35).

Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) staining on bacteria has a function to label the bacteria with FITC fluorescence so that it can be detected using a flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). Meanwhile, the provision of CD35+ antibody is a marker which indirectly indicates the cell observed the process of phagocytosis, which was neutrophil cell. The staining of CFSE+ CD35+ aims to detect the ability of neutrophil cells which have complement receptors (CD35+) in performing phagocytosis on bacteria (labeled CFSE+).


   Results Top


The result of the analysis of saliva was activated to perform phagocytosis of Streptococcus mutans and labeled by CFSE staining which expresses the CD35+ on S-ECC and caries-free [Table 1] and [Figure 1]. The results of flow cytometry analysis are presented in [Figure 2].
Table 1: Mean and standard deviation of the amount of saliva neutrophils which was activated to perform phagocytosis of bacteria Streptococcus mutants labeled by Carboxyfluorescein N-hydroxysuccinimide ester staining expressing CD35+ on the severe early Childhood caries and caries-free (%)

Click here to view
Figure 1: Mean and standard deviation neutrophils saliva which was activated to perform phagocytosis of bacteria Streptococcus mutans which was labeled by carboxyfluorescein N-hydroxysuccinimide ester staining expressing CD35+ on the severe early childhood caries and caries-free (%)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Neutrophil which was activated to perform phagocytosis to Streptococcus mutans which was labeled Carboxyfluorescein N-hydroxysuccinimide ester expressing CD35+ which was detected by using flow cytometry on early childhood free caries (a) and on severe early childhood caries (b)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Phagocytosis by neutrophil is a very complex process started by bacterial attachment on neutrophil mediated through a molecule opsonization that binds the component of bacterium surface and promotes phagocytosis. The protein C3b is an important opsonin which can be tied by complement receptor 1/CR1 (CD35) on the neutrophil surface, causing the internalization of bacterium into phagosome, and then, leading to a fusion of phagosome-lysosome which can cause degradation of bacteria cell.[11]

Complement receptor 1/CR1 (CD35) is a single-chain glycoprotein with a molecule weight of 220 kDa which serves as the binder of C3b fragment from C3 as well as iC3b and C4b (Klickstein and Moulds, 2000). CD35 is involved in an important way of binding microbe opsonized by C3b before it undergoes phagocytosis by neutrophil. It also functions as a regulator of complement cascade, being a decay accelerator and cofactor for I factor enzyme.[12]

Based on the result, saliva neutrophil shows that the expression level of CD35+ on S-ECC is lower than the expression level CD35+ on free caries children [Table 1]. It is shown that the average value of expression level of CD35+ that can be detected on neutrophil saliva in S-ECC is lower (1.54% ± 0.35%) and it is different significantly compared to the expression level of CD35+ in early Childhood free caries (2.35% ± 0.56%).

The result of the research indicates that the process of phagocytosis on S. mutans mediated through opsonization process by complement on salivary neutrophil of preschool-age children with severe caries is significantly lower in expressing CD35+ than that in caries-free children. The low expression of CD35 on S-ECC compared to caries-free might be caused by the inability of innate immunity component on S-ECC to perform phagocytosis effectively to S. mutans through complement opsonization. Complement receptors (CRs) will recognize the component from complement cascade on the phagocyte target surface.[13]

In addition, it is also possible that the marker of CD35+ on saliva neutrophil on S-ECC is less expressed because the neutrophil is less sensitive toward S. mutans. It is because the activated neutrophil triggers the change of conformation in complement receptor CD35 as a precondition to bind microbes and enables phagocytosis transduction signal. The complement system, including CD35, denotes protein fragment with special ability to activate, coordinate, and regulate pro-inflammatory and proteolytic agents from the immune system.[14] The reduce expression and functional deficiency of complement component may modulate the susceptibility of some disorder due to the genetic variation. This subsequently may reduce the activated complement from the opsonized pathogen, thus increasing resistance toward pathogens that depend on phagocytosis to initiate infection.[15]

The next possibility is that S. mutans have a strategy to avoid host immune through a mechanism of biofilms formation which serves as a physical obstacle to increase the resistance of pathogens to host defense such as opsonization, lysis by complement, and phagocytosis.[16] The pathogen may evade complement activity by recruiting host complement regulators, acquisition the host protease which plays role in untwist complement protein in bacterial surface and secret protease to inactivate complement.[17] This may cause significantly lower expression of CD35 on S-ECC compared to that on caries-free children.


   Conclusion Top


A decrease of CD35+ expression on the surface of salivary neutrophils is an early detection marker of SECC.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Policy on early childhood caries: classifications, consequences, and preventive Strategies. Ref Man 2016;40:18-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Filstrup SL, Briskie D, da Fonseca M, Lawrence L, Wandera A, Inglehart MR. Early childhood caries and quality of life: Child and parent perspectives. Pediatr Dent 2003;25:431-40.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Clarke M, Locker D, Berall G, Pencharz P, Kenny DJ, Judd P. Malnourishment in a population of young children with severe early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent 2006;28:254-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Moore R, Brødsgaard I, Rosenberg N. The contribution of embarrassment to phobic dental anxiety: A qualitative research study. BMC Psychiatry 2004;4:10.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Elbim C, Katsikis PD, Estaquier J. Neutrophil apoptosis during viral infections. Open Virol J 2009;3:52-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: Challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:173-82.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Costantini C, Jaillon S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11:519-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kobayashi SD, Voyich JM, Burlak C, DeLeo FR. Neutrophils in the innate immune response. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2005;53:505-17.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Phattarataratip, E.. The role of salivary antimicrobial peptides in shaping Streptococcus mutans ecolog. Annu Rev Microbiol 2010; 57:677-701.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gasparoto TH, Vieira NA, Porto VC, Campanelli AP, Lara VS. Differences between salivary and blood neutrophils from elderly and young denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:41-51.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sarantis H, Grinstein S. Subversion of phagocytosis for pathogen survival. Cell Host Microbe 2012;12:419-31.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Fearon DT. Regulation of the amplification C3 convertase of human complement by an inhibitory protein isolated from human erythrocyte membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979;76:5867-71.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Brown E. Complement receptors, adhesion, and phagocytosis. In: Rosales, editor. Molecular Mechanisms of Phagocytosis. Georgetown: Springer Science; 2005:49-57.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ricklin D, Hajishengallis G, Yang K, Lambris JD. Complement: a key system for immune surveillance and homeostasis. Nat Immunol 2010;11:785-97.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Dupnik KM, Bair TB, Maia AO, Amorim FM, Costa MR, Keesen TS, et al. Transcriptional changes that characterize the immune reactions of leprosy. J Infect Dis 2015;211:1658-76.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Fraga TR, Isaac L, Barbosa AS. Complement Evasion by Pathogenic Leptospira. Front Immunol 2016;7:623.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zipfel PF, Hallström T, Riesbeck K. Human complement control and complement evasion by pathogenic microbes-tipping the balance. Mol Immunol 2013;56:152-60.  Back to cited text no. 17
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed105    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal