Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 855  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 256-260  

Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Dental School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2 Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
3 Department Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Date of Web Publication21-Sep-2018

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Maryam Rabiei
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Dental School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Lakan Street, Rasht
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_175_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background and Aim: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) may be defined as a burning sensation in the oral mucosa usually unaccompanied by clinical signs. Multiple conditions have been attributed to a burning sensation. The aim of this study was to determine the role of age and sex in BMS. Materials and Methods: A total of 195 consecutive patients with BMS and 95 healthy patients without burning sensation were recruited in this study. Patients with BMS had experienced oral, burning sensations for at least 6 months without oral clinical signs, and with a normal blood count. Multiple logistic regression analyses were utilized to define the main predictors. Results: Menopause, candidiasis, psychological disorders, job status, denture, and dry mouth were significantly frequent in BMS patients. Multivariate logistic regression indicated age (odds ratio (OR) =1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08–1.15, P < 0.0001) and sex (OR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.4–6.7, P < 0.002) significantly increase the odds of BMS. Psychological disorders (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 1.2–9.5, P < 0.02) and candidiasis remain as predictive factors. Ultimately, age was defined as a critical predictor. Moreover, we can therefore predict that a 60-year-old woman with psychological disorders is 25 times more likely to suffer from BMS than a man 10 years younger who has no psychological disorder. Conclusion: Age and sex were the main predictors in BMS. Psychological disorders and candidiasis were significantly associated with the occurrence of BMS.

Keywords: Burning mouth syndrome, mouth disease, risk factors


How to cite this article:
Rabiei M, Leili EK, Alizadeh L. Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study. Contemp Clin Dent 2018;9, Suppl S2:256-60

How to cite this URL:
Rabiei M, Leili EK, Alizadeh L. Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 11];9, Suppl S2:256-60. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2018/9/6/256/241720


   Introduction Top


Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic oral dysesthesia characterized by a burning sensation of the oral cavity with clinically normal mucosa.[1],[2] BMS is an interesting condition as its etiology is multifactorial.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] The estimated prevalence of BMS reported in recent studies ranges between 0.7% and 15% in the general population, while it made up 10% of the outpatients of oral medicine clinics.[3],[5],[7],[12] The vast majority of affected persons are older than 50 years and there is a preponderance of women (male-to-female ratio between 1 and 4) that were postmenopausal or had experienced sex hormonal change.[3],[9],[10],[11],[12]

Most patients experience burning sensations of moderate-to-severe intensity with mean severity of about 4.6–8 cm on a 0–10 cm visual analog scale.[1],[8],[14],[15],[16] The tongue is the most common site of the complaint, though it may be accompanied by other parts of the mouth.[5],[6],[8],[9],[16]

Physiological and psychological factors play a role in causing and/or exacerbating BMS with continuum, but the interaction between these remains poorly understood.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[13],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21] Many studies also reported adverse life events in the onset of disease.[6],[9],[15] BMS has negative impacts on the quality of life, while a placebo or different treatments may improve their quality of life.[14],[15] Anxiety and depression were the common features in BMS patients.[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] Other characteristics of BMS included cancer phobia, gastrointestinal problems, and chronic fatigue.[3],[21] Emotional and environmental stress makes them vulnerable to chronic pain. Vulnerability is associated with the onset and presentation of BMS, but the interaction in details is not ascertained.[21] They also referred to “oral sensorial complaints”.[24] The BMS group presented higher cortisol levels, K+ and amylase, nerve growth factor, substance P, and tryptase activity in the saliva.[16],[23],[24],[25] Different etiologic factors are postulated in the onset of BMS with different strengths. In spite of this point, patient management is unreliable. This is the first study performed to access age or sex as factor associated with BMS.

The aim of this study was to explore different etiologic factors contributing to BMS and to estimate the magnitude of their value by considering age and sex in a comparative cross-sectional study.


   Materials and Methods Top


One hundred and ninety-five patients presenting with BMS and 95 individual without this symptom participated in this prospective cross-sectional study. BMS patients had been consecutively referred to Oral Medicine and the Oral Diagnosis Clinic at the Guilan University of Medical Sciences from 2001 to 2010. A total of 156 women (72.9%) and 39 men (27.1%) in the BMS group were recruited in this study by estimating sample size with power 90% and 95% confidence interval (CI).[21]

All the patients diagnosed with BMS exhibited clinically normal oral mucosa associated with a burning oral sensation which they had had for at least 6 months as inclusion criteria. Clinical examination was investigated by two professors in oral medicine and oral pathology.

A detailed demographic history was undertaken by interview and patients underwent a thorough clinical oral examination. Their medical history was recorded and verified by a physician. The possible underlying causes were investigated, and all patients underwent routine hematologic screening tests to rule out all possible organic etiologies (serum iron, total iron-binding capacity, Vitamin B12, hemoglobin count, folic acid, fasting blood glucose, and thyroid profile values).

None of the patients presented any evidence of malignancy, connective tissue, metabolic or infectious disorders, or vitamin deficiency. Patients with dentures were assessed for fitness, function, and candidiasis. Swabs for Candida were taken before the diagnosis was made. Those with candidiasis were treated with antifungal therapy with common products used in Iran (Nistat 100,000 I.U./ml, Jaber Ebne Hayyan, Tehran, Iran) and if their burning sensation continued, they were included in patient groups as inclusion criteria.

Psychiatric assessment was on the basis of past medical and/or psychiatric history (preceding diagnosis) and presented psychogenic symptoms which were confirmed with their physician. Xerostomia was determined by questionnaire comprised four essential questions.[26]

As mentioned, it is postulated that gender and age have profound influences on BMS, hence a prospective, comparative, cross-sectional study was carried out to account for age and sex as predictors. The comparative group “without BMS” comprised 95 patients without any complaint of burning mouth who had sought dental treatment at the Department of Oral Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences. The study protocol was approved by the local Ethical Committee (Guilan University of Medical Science) and consent was obtained. The characteristics of BMS patients and non-BMS controls were transferred to data sheets (SPSS v 17.SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and analyzed statistically. Chi-squared test and t-test were used to evaluate differences in group characteristics. Odd ratio and CI were estimated for each predictor. Backward logistic regression model was applied for significantly altered parameters. Hosmer–Lemeshow test as a goodness-of-fit models approved the predictors. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.


   Results Top


[Table 1] illustrates the general profile of the study population. There was an unequal gender distribution in favor of females; 156 women (72.9%) and 39 men (27. 1%) in the BMS group. There was a difference in distribution of patients according to age group; with preponderance in the age ≥50 years, with the mean age (56 ± 13.9 years) which was significantly different from the mean age of the non-BMS group (35.4 ± 12.6 years), P < 0.0001 [Figure 1].
Table 1: Profile of burning mouth syndrome patients and comparative group

Click here to view
Figure 1: Comparison of age in burning mouth syndrome and nonburning mouth syndrome

Click here to view


The univariate analyses [Table 2] showed that menopause (OR = 20.72 95% CI: 8.32–51.61) was significantly associated with, while early indications of candidiasis (OR = 7.42 95% CI: 2.27–24.72), psychological disorders (OR = 5.45, 95% CI: 2.38–12.48), job status (OR = 4.23 95% CI: 2.50–7.5) (P < 0.0001), and sex, denture (P < 0.001) accompanied with dry mouth (P < 0.002) by order of mention exhibited higher incidence odd ratios for BMS. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was undertaken to estimate the relationship between the variables that were statistically significant in univariate analysis. This part was made up of two steps with subtle distinction. In the first step, the role of factors assessed in both sexes revealed that, age, sex, and psychogenic factors can be predictor factors of BMS in both sexes [Table 3]. The second step focused on the role of factors by excluding menopause from univariate remaining factors (special features for sex). [Table 4] shows that only age remains as a predictor in BMS. Psychological disorders show less strength odd in this step but are kept as predictors. By taking outcomes into consideration in hierarchical approach, age is the specific ultimate measure which is significantly associated with the onset of a disease, but after that psychogenic disorder may could be another risk factor which may increase the odds of BMS. Goodness-of-fit models were checked by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test (P = 0.931 and P = 0.793). By means of calculation based on [Table 4], we can predict that the susceptibility (probability) of BMS in women may increase >3.38 fold by rise in age per decade (OR = 3.38, 95% CI: 2.39–4.8) and we can predict that a 60-year-old woman with a psychological disorder is 8.9 times more likely to suffer from BMS than a 50-year-old woman without psychological disease (OR = 8.9, 95% CI: 6.33–12.75). Based on [Table 3], we can anticipate that a 60-year-old woman with a psychological problem is 25 times more susceptible to BMS than a 50-year-old man without a psychological problem (OR = 25, 95% CI: 19.76–33.4).
Table 2: Odds ratios and confidence intervals: Univariate analysis

Click here to view
Table 3: Backward Wald stepwise multiple logistic regression coefficient of odds ratio and confidence

Click here to view
Table 4: Stepwise multiple logistic regression coefficient of odds ratio and confidence for variables

Click here to view


More than 70% of patients complained of burning sensation in their oral cavity with no distinct part (71.7%); tongue (12.8%): anterior part (46%), the lateral border of tongue (43%), and the center of the tongue (11%); lips and gingiva (2.5%).


   Discussion Top


This study pointed out the importance of risk factors in BMS. The condition is complex and generated considerable debate. Eliciting predictors and highlighting them is of paramount importance in patient management. This study provides a new insight into these issues, defines that age and sex are the critical risk factors and has a substantial correlation with the occurrence of BMS.

Different studies implicitly acknowledge that patients in their mid to late fifties are prone to the burning sensation.[3],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] However, different methodological research applied could only mention that patients with BMS are of older age without determining and outweighing this important risk factor. On the basis of multiple logistic regressions in this nonmatch cross-sectional study, results pointed out that age was a consistent predictor; the probability of BMS increases by passing decades of life. Gender difference was addressed in different studies;[1],[3],[4],[5],[6],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] however, investigation into this issue was verified by outcomes; identifying that sex is the main risk factor to increase the odds of BMS. The male-to-female ratio in BMS group was 1:4. The female preponderance is in accordance with almost all studies.[1],[5],[6],[9],[10]

Menopause is absolutely critical and accounted for the main predictor in concern to outcomes, in univariate analysis, provide support to other studies.[1],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[21] The criterion for postmenopause was the time after which a woman has experienced 12 consecutive months of amenorrhea (lack of menstruation) without a period. Due to this phenomenon, women may be liable to physical and emotional changes including vasomotor changes (hot flushes, profuse perspiration, and palpitation), psychogenic disorders (depression, tiredness, irritability,), and other complaints such as headaches.[9] Different reports offer the prevalence of BMS as about 17.9%–93% in postmenopausal women.[9] However, hormone supplement therapy could alter burning sensation in different studies without eliminating it completely.[1],[3],[4],[6],[8],[9],[12] Virtually as a whole, young women who present multiple etiologic factors rarely experience BMS.

This investigation also verified that psychological disorders increase the chance of BMS especially in females, making them 25 times more susceptible than male. Although recent research indicates that psychological factors play a role in causing or exacerbating BMS, this study provides support that strengthens the role and odds of psychogenic disorders.

Different studies claim that patients with BMS suffered from psychological disorders.[1],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[11],[12],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] Psychological disorders, especially depression and anxiety, are the most common features reported in different studies. Psychological disturbances and adverse life events can decrease the patient's tolerance, making them more susceptible to different chronic diseases.[1],[3],[5],[6],[7],[8],[10],[15],[18],[19],[22],[23] Rational treatments are relying on controlling this causal factor. Although relief in different studies has been reported, nevertheless success in treatment with permanent remission dooms to failure and patients are always seeking for further medications.[1],[3],[5],[7],[8],[9],[16],[27],[28] On the other hand, this study apparently showed that age and sex are inevitably the underlying risk factors which are out of control. Eventually, reasons for failure in treatment need to be explained to patients before initiating treatment.

Job status or in detail homemakers revealed a significant association within BMS and 66% of patients with BMS were unemployed. Implicitly, Grushka pointed out that a person's job may have an effect on BMS.[13] Unemployed females older in age with postmenopausal history with or without psychological disorders may feel insecure and this circumstance may rise the chance of BMS in them more than in fully employed women. It was verified by another study investigating into etiologic factors implicitly as adverse life events.[6],[13],[21]

Significant relationship between candidiasis and BMS has been defined in this study; 19% of BMS patients had been treated for candidiasis. Many studies stated that patients are often triggered by other predisposing factors such as wearing a denture or having xerostomia.[5],[9],[11],[13],[29] It was proposed that at least one-third of patients attributed the onset of their syndrome to a previous illness or a course of antibiotics or candidiasis.[30] In this study, 24% of the patients with BMS used dentures though there were no ill-fitting dentures or other problems to cause candidiasis infection. Zegarelli indicated that 30% of patients were treated for candidiasis in relation to BMS,[11] but another study showed that there was no significant relation between candidiasis and BMS. Twenty-two study on etiologic factors stated that parafunctional habits may elucidate an association with on BMS.[6]

Another possible risk factor for BMS is xerostomia. There was a significant relationship between xerostomia and BMS in this investigation; 27% of BMS patients suffered from xerostomia. Many studies indicated that xerostomia was a principal contributing factor.[1],[3],[9],[6],[10],[11],[12],[23],[29]

Most patients perceived burning in the whole oral cavity or in more than one site. This is an interesting finding and may be attributed to the culture of the respondents or the type of question. Nevertheless, we do not quantify pain in this study, and it was the limitation of the present study; therefore, a question may arise in concern to whether multiple etiologic factors increase the severity of the burning perception? Further studies need to assess pain by multiple conditions. The subsidiary sites of BMS were the tongue, especially the anterior part of the tongue. Different authors have shown that burning sensation can be reported in each location and in more than one site or in the whole mouth. They found that the tongue, especially its anterior part, the dorsum, and the anterior lateral margins are the most frequently affected areas.[1],[2],[3],[5],[6],[7],[13],[14],[16],[18],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] Although studies reveal that gustatory and somatosensory pain perception may decrease in BMS patients, especially in the tongue.[31]


   Conclusion Top


In this comparative study, in the absence of local and systemic underlying factors, we conclude that age and sex are the main factors in the onset of BMS. Postmenopausal women with psychological disorders may have higher likelihood for BMS. Other predictors such as candidiasis, job status, denture, and xerostomia revealed association by different odds for the occurrence of BMS strength to cause BMS.

Acknowledgment

The authors offer their special thanks to Dr Paul Riordan and Uma Arshad for his advice and translation.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Abetz LM, Savage NW. Burning mouth syndrome and psychological disorders. Aust Dent J 2009;54:84-93.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sardella A, Gualerzi A, Lodi G, Sforza C, Carrassi A, Donetti E, et al. Morphological evaluation of tongue mucosa in burning mouth syndrome. Arch Oral Biol 2012;57:94-101.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sun A, Wu KM, Wang YP, Lin HP, Chen HM, Chiang CP, et al. Burning mouth syndrome: A review and update. J Oral Pathol Med 2013;42:649-55.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Drage LA, Rogers RS 3rd. Burning mouth syndrome. Dermatol Clin 2003;21:135-45.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Torgerson RR. Burning mouth syndrome. Dermatol Ther 2010;23:291-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gao J, Chen L, Zhou J, Peng J. A case-control study on etiological factors involved in patients with burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Pathol Med 2009;38:24-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Patton LL, Siegel MA, Benoliel R, De Laat A. Management of burning mouth syndrome: Systematic review and management recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103 Suppl: S39.e1-13.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sardella A, Lodi G, Demarosi F, Uglietti D, Carrassi A. Causative or precipitating aspects of burning mouth syndrome: A case-control study. J Oral Pathol Med 2006;35:466-71.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Tourne LP, Fricton JR. Burning mouth syndrome. Critical review and proposed clinical management. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:158-67.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Maresky LS, van der Bijl P, Gird I. Burning mouth syndrome. Evaluation of multiple variables among 85 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75:303-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Zegarelli DJ. Burning mouth: An analysis of 57 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:34-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. Burning mouth syndrome: Prevalence and associated factors. J Oral Pathol Med 1999;28:350-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Grushka M. Clinical features of burning mouth syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:30-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F, Lucero-Berdugo M. Quality of life in patients with burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Pathol Med 2008;37:389-94.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ni Riordain R, Moloney E, O'Sullivan K, McCreary C. Burning mouth syndrome and oral health-related quality of life: Is there a change over time? Oral Dis 2010;16:643-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kim HI, Kim YY, Chang JY, Ko JY, Kho HS. Salivary cortisol, 17β-estradiol, progesterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, and α-amylase in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Oral Dis 2012;18:613-20.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Browning S, Hislop S, Scully C, Shirlaw P. The association between burning mouth syndrome and psychosocial disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;64:171-4.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
van der Ploeg HM, van der Wal N, Eijkman MA, van der Waal I. Psychological aspects of patients with burning mouth syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:664-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Rojo L, Silvestre FJ, Bagan JV, De Vicente T. Psychiatric morbidity in burning mouth syndrome. Psychiatric interview versus depression and anxiety scales. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75:308-11.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rojo L, Silvestre FJ, Bagan JV, De Vicente T. Prevalence of psychopathology in burning mouth syndrome. A comparative study among patients with and without psychiatric disorders and controls. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:312-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lamey PJ, Freeman R, Eddie SA, Pankhurst C, Rees T. Vulnerability and presenting symptoms in burning mouth syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:48-54.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Al Quran FA. Psychological profile in burning mouth syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:339-44.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Amenábar JM, Pawlowski J, Hilgert JB, Hugo FN, Bandeira D, Lhüller F, et al. Anxiety and salivary cortisol levels in patients with burning mouth syndrome: Case-control study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:460-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Granot M, Nagler RM. Association between regional idiopathic neuropathy and salivary involvement as the possible mechanism for oral sensory complaints. J Pain 2005;6:581-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Borelli V, Marchioli A, Di Taranto R, Romano M, Chiandussi S, Di Lenarda R, et al. Neuropeptides in saliva of subjects with burning mouth syndrome: A pilot study. Oral Dis 2010;16:365-74.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Navazesh M, Kumar SK. Measuring salivary flow: challenges and opportunities. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:35S-40S.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
de Moraes M, do Amaral Bezerra BA, da Rocha Neto PC, de Oliveira Soares AC, Pinto LP, de Lisboa Lopes Costa A, et al. Randomized trials for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: An evidence-based review of the literature. J Oral Pathol Med 2012;41:281-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Sardella A, Lodi G, Demarosi F, Bez C, Cassano S, Carrassi A, et al. Burning mouth syndrome: A retrospective study investigating spontaneous remission and response to treatments. Oral Dis 2006;12:152-5.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Katz J, Benoliel R, Leviner E. Burning mouth sensation associated with fusospirochetal infection in edentulous patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;62:152-4.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F, Andujar-Mateos P, Sánchez-Siles M, Gómez-Garcia F. Burning mouth syndrome: An update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e562-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Just T, Steiner S, Pau HW. Oral pain perception and taste in burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Pathol Med 2010;39:22-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed229    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded53    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal