Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 1784  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 81-85  

Appraisal of the remineralizing potential of child formula dentifrices on primary teeth: An i n vitropH cycling model


Department of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication11-Mar-2015

Correspondence Address:
S V S G Nirmala
Department of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore - 524 003, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.152951

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Aim: To evaluate the remineralizing potential of child formula dentifrices on primary teeth using an in vitro 7 days pH cycling model. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one primary teeth were placed in demineralizing solution for 96 h to produce artificial carious lesions; then cut longitudinally into 100-150 μm thick sections and randomly assigned to three groups. Sections in Group A were treated with dentifrice containing 458 ppm monofluorophosphate (MFP) and sections in Group B with 500 ppm sodium fluoride (NaF). Group C sections were treated with a nonfluoridated dentifrice. Results: Group A (458 ppm MFP) and Group B (500 ppm NaF) showed significant decrease in lesion depth, whereas Group C (non F) showed a significant increase in depth (P ≤ 0.05, paired t-test). Conclusion: Though dentifrices containing 458 ppm MFP and 500 ppm NaF demonstrated remineralization of carious lesions, it was not complete. Therefore, it is also important to emphasize on other preventive methods in the prevention and/or reversal of carious lesions.

Keywords: Artificial caries, fluoride dentifrices, pH cycling, primary teeth


How to cite this article:
Kiranmayi M, Nirmala S, Nuvvula S. Appraisal of the remineralizing potential of child formula dentifrices on primary teeth: An i n vitropH cycling model. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6, Suppl S1:81-5

How to cite this URL:
Kiranmayi M, Nirmala S, Nuvvula S. Appraisal of the remineralizing potential of child formula dentifrices on primary teeth: An i n vitropH cycling model. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Dec 10];6, Suppl S1:81-5. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2015/6/5/81/152951


   Introduction Top


Caries prevention is one of the hallmarks of contemporary dental practice. According to the World Oral Health Report, dental caries remains a major public health problem in most countries, affecting 60-90% of school going children and a vast majority of adults, [1] and this may be due to the changing lifestyles, dietary habits, increased sugar consumption and inadequate exposure to fluorides. The primary teeth are more susceptible to caries development than permanent teeth because of lower mineral and higher organic content of enamel. [2] Compared to adults, the demineralization potential at low oral pH is greater while the remineralization potential at normal pH is lower in children. [3] Hence, the progression of caries will be faster, and reversal will be slower in children, as they depend upon the balance between demineralization and remineralization.

Fluorides have the ability to remineralize early carious lesions, and can be used as active anticariogenic agents, [4] which are available in the form of dentifrices, mouth rinses, varnishes, gels, and foams. Fluoride dentifrices are the most widely used products that deliver topical fluoride to the oral environment. Most fluoride dentifrices contain fluoride predominantly in the form of sodium fluoride (NaF) or sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP) and other formulations are with amine fluoride or stannous fluoride. The content of fluoride varies between 500 and 1500 ppm and are categorized into low-fluoride (<600 ppm F), standard (1000 ppm F) or high-fluoride (1500 ppm F) dentifrices. [4] The daily use of a fluoridated dentifrice will provide sufficient fluoride to maintain appropriate levels in saliva and plaque to actively influence remineralization, but the major drawback of fluoride dentifrices is the risk of dental fluorosis in children. Fluoride toothpastes contribute approximately 57% of the total daily amount of fluoride ingested by 4- to 7-year-old children, which occurs because of less control over swallowing especially in preschool children. [5] Preventive measures to reduce the ingestion of fluorides from toothpastes are necessary, such as reducing the amount of toothpaste used, supervised brushing in preschool children and developing low-fluoride toothpastes. [6] The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry recommends low-fluoride dentifrices for children aged 2-6 years twice daily. The amount to be used should be of a small pea or of smear size. [7]

Many studies were conducted to test the de/remineralizing efficacy of fluoridated and nonfluoridated dentifrices on the enamel of permanent teeth, [8],[9],[10],[11] with only a few studies conducted on the de/remineralization efficacy of low-fluoridated dentifrices on carious lesions in primary teeth. [12],[13],[14],[15],[16] Hence, there is an increasing need to know the effect of fluoride dentifrices on the carious lesions of the enamel in primary teeth. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the de/remineralization potential of different child formula dentifrices on artificial carious lesions in primary teeth using a 7 days pH-cycling model.


   Materials and methods Top


Dentifrices used

  • Cheerio gel® : A fluoride dentifrice manufactured by Group Pharmaceuticals Limited, Malur and marketed by Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India (contents: 0.35% sodium MFP USP in a flavored gel base)
  • Colgate Pokιmon toothpaste® : A fluoride dentifrice manufactured by Colgate Palmolive, USA (contents: 0.11% NaF, sorbitol, silica abrasive)
  • Children natural toothpaste® : A nonfluoridated dentifrice manufactured by Pigeon Company, Korea (contents: Calcium phosphate, glycerine, maltilol, carrageenan, flavor), which served as a negative control.
De/and remineralizing solutions

The demineralizing solution was prepared to create the artificial lesions. It contained 2.2 mM CaCl 2 , 2.2 mM KH 2 PO 4 , and 0.05M acetic acid. 1M KOH was used to adjust pH to 4.4. The remineralizing solution contained 1.5 mM CaCl 2 , 0.9 mM NaH 2 PO 4 , 0.15M KCl and pH of 7. [17]

Dentifrice supernatants

The dentifrice supernatants were prepared by thoroughly mixing a 3:1 ratio (by weight) of deionized water and dentifrice, which was then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min.

Lesion formation

Twenty-one sound primary teeth indicated for extraction due to preshedding mobility were collected, and soft tissue debris was cleaned and then stored in 0.2% thymol solution. The teeth were inspected for cracks, hypoplasia and white spot lesions and then coated with an acid resistant nail varnish, leaving a narrow window, approximately 1 mm wide on the sound, intact surface of the buccal or lingual enamel. Then, they were immersed in demineralizing solution for 96 h to produce artificial carious lesions of 150-200 μm deep. The teeth were embedded in self-cure acrylic resin blocks. A hard tissue microtome (Leica 1600 Saw Microtome® , Germany) was used to section the teeth longitudinally through the lesions to produce enamel specimens of approximately 100-150 μm thick. The damaged specimens were discarded, and the rest of the specimens were randomly assigned for each of the three groups (Groups A, B and C). Polarizing light microscopy was utilized to record the depth of the lesions. The sections were painted under a stereomicroscope with acid resistant nail varnish leaving the lesion surface exposed for exposure to experimental solutions. The specimens were suspended with dental floss in a beaker containing deionized water and sealed with paraffin wax to achieve 100% humidity until usage.

pH-cycling model

All of the specimens in a particular group were placed in the pH-cycling system on an orbital shaker (Kemi Company™, Kadavil Electromechanical Industries, Ernakulam, Kerala) for a period of 7 days. Each cycle involved 3 h of demineralization twice daily, with 2 h of remineralization between periods of demineralization. Dentifrice supernatant was treated for 60 s before the first demineralization and both before and after the second demineralization. Sections were then placed in the remineralizing solution overnight.

The demineralizing, remineralizing solutions and dentifrice supernatants were freshly prepared for each cycle and stored in separate containers designed for each group throughout the experimental period. Before a topical treatment with supernatant solutions, the teeth were removed from the de-/remineralizing solutions and thoroughly washed with deionized water. The de-/remineralizing solutions and supernatant solutions were changed daily to prevent depletion or saturation of the solutions and accumulation of enamel dissolution products. The sections were then studied under polarized light microscopy to evaluate the lesion depth before and after 7 days.

Evaluation techniques

Polarizing light microscopy measurements

For clear demarcation between sound and carious enamel, the specimens were imbibed in water and then recorded using polarizing light microscope both before and after pH-cycling, to evaluate qualitatively the lesion depth in each enamel section [Figure 1] [Figure 2] [Figure 3]. The depths of the lesions were measured with a computerized calculation method using a software program (ProgRes® , Germany).
Figure 1: Polarized light micrographs of enamel lesions before (a) and after (b) pH cycling for Group A

Click here to view
Figure 2: Polarized light micrographs of enamel lesions before (a) and after (b) pH cycling for Group B

Click here to view
Figure 3: Polarized light micrographs of enamel lesions before (a) and after (b) pH cycling for Group C

Click here to view



   Results Top


Seven sections of Group A were treated with cheeriogel * and the mean score, and standard deviation (SD) was 180 ± 26 before pH-cycling and 175 ± 22 after pH-cycling (P = 0.01). Similarly in seven sections of Group B treated with Colgate pokeman*, the mean score and SD was 191 ± 2l before pH-cycling and 173 ± 16 after pH-cycling (P = 0.03). In seven sections of Group C treated with children's natural, the mean score and SD was 183 ± 30 before pH-cycling and 201 ± 18 after pH-cycling (P = 0.04) [Table 1]. In all the groups, there exists a statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Table 1: Comparison of the depth of the lesion before and after pH cycling in Group A (cheerio gel), Group B (Colgate paokeman) and Group C (children's natural)


Click here to view


Inter group comparison revealed that, the mean and SD in Groups A and B after pH Cycling had decreased than the mean and SD before pH cycling. Only mean and SD for Group C had increased after pH cycling.

The means and SD's of the pretreatment lesion depths between Groups A, B and C were not significantly different from each other (P = 0.745) as shown in [Table 2]. This shows that, even though, the specimens were sectioned from different primary teeth, the variations among the teeth did not show a major effect on the progress of demineralization.
Table 2: Comparison of the depth of the lesion among the pretreatment Groups A, B and C using ANOVA


Click here to view


On comparison, the posttreatment lesion depths of Groups A, B and C showed Mean and SD as 175 ± 22, 173 ± 16 and 201 ± 18 respectively, which was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.012) as shown in [Table 3].
Table 3: Comparison of the depth of the lesion among the posttreatment Groups A, B and C using ANOVA


Click here to view


On overall comparison, the lesion depths in Groups A and B decreased by 3% and 10% respectively, while Group C demonstrated an increase in lesion depth by 9% [Table 1]. Comparisons using ANOVA and paired t-test showed that Groups A and B were significantly different from Group C, but there was no statistical significance between Groups A and B. On using Duncan's multiple range test, it was observed that Group A differ from Group C (P < 0.05) but not with Group B (P > 0.05), whereas Group B differs significantly from Group C (P < 0.05).


   Discussion Top


The caries process is a continuum resulting from an imbalance between many cycles of demineralization and remineralization rather than a unidirectional demineralization process. Fluoride has been shown to have a greater inhibitory effect on caries progression than on caries initiation. [18] The levels needed to significantly reduce caries or, at a mechanistic level to shift the balance from caries initiation and progression to caries reversal are apparently in the sub ppm range. [19] Hence, the present study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the remineralization effects of different child formula dentifrices on artificial carious lesions in primary teeth using a 7 days pH-cycling model.

Artificial early caries-like lesions of the enamel showed all the principal histological features of natural caries and had been successfully used to study the remineralization of enamel in vitro. These artificial lesions of the enamel were more homogenously reproducible than natural lesions and thus provide a reliable experimental model, [20] hence; carious lesions were artificially produced in the present study.

Extracted or naturally exfoliated primary teeth (molars, canines, and incisors) were used for lesion formation in this study. Though there are variations in the morphology of individual teeth, it was hypothesized that these variations among the teeth do not play a significant role in caries formation, [16] and in the present study too, the depths in the pretreatment test groups were not statistically different. This implies that, even though, the specimens were sectioned from different teeth, the variations among the teeth did not show a major effect on the progress of demineralization.

Single-section model, as used in this study had the advantage that a single section was fully evaluated prior to the experimental period and then again after the exposure period. Thus, any change was only due to exposure of the experimental solutions. The de/remineralizing solutions and supernatant solutions were changed daily to prevent depletion or saturation of the solutions and accumulation of enamel dissolution products.

The concept of in vitro pH cycling was first proposed by ten Cate and Duijsters in 1982, in experiments where they exposed artificial carious lesions in enamel to a combination of remineralizing and demineralizing solutions. [17] Two types of pH-cycling models are used, the 7-day pH-cycling and the 10-day pH-cycling. A 10-day pH-cycling model can be used on the enamel of permanent teeth whereas a 7-day pH-cycling or 10-day cycling with added 0.25 ppm fluoride can be used for primary teeth. [9],[14],[15],[20],[21] In the present study, pH-cycling was done for 7 days without the addition of fluoride, because the addition of fluoride could have interfered with the hypothesis being tested.

Fluoride dentifrices remain the most widely used method of delivering topical fluoride. NaF and sodium MFP contain fluoride in chemically distinct forms, and they will differ in their mode of action with respect to caries reduction. The reason for greater retention of oral fluoride from NaF than from MFP could be due to: (1) Fluoride ions diffuse faster from NaF than MFP, by a factor of 1000 in dental enamel; (2) there is no MFP analogue of calcium fluoride, which is important in oral fluoride retention; (3) fluoride ions from MFP bind to a lesser extent to tooth mineral and plaque bacteria than NaF. [4],[22],[23]

An extensive series of in vitro and clinical trials have tested the anticaries efficacy of dentifrices containing NaF or MFP. Many in vitro studies [11],[16],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33] suggest that dentifrices containing NaF perform better than dentifrices containing MFP whereas a study [34] concluded no statistically significant difference between the two. Clinical studies [35],[36] concluded that NaF was as equally effective to MFP in caries reduction. The efficacy of fluoride toothpastes in clinical trials is potentially influenced by several factors, namely: Fluoride concentration, frequency of use, amount used and rinsing behavior whereas in the in vitro studies, the sole factor that plays key role is the fluoride concentration used. [5] This might be the reason for less effectiveness of MFP in the in vitro studies than in vivo studies. This again might be due to the absence of a key mechanistic step in the in vitro studies in determining the clinical efficiency of MFP, namely the hydrolysis of MFP to fluoride ions. These are in accordance with the present study where, both the MFP and NaF dentifrices showed decrease in the lesion depths and the difference between the two was not statistically significant. But the NaF had showed a greater decrease in lesion depth confirming its superior anticaries efficacy over MFP.


   Conclusion Top


Based on the results obtained from the present study, we could conclude that the child formula dentifrices containing NaF and sodium monofluorophosphate have the ability to remineralize the initial carious lesions in the primary teeth as both reduced the depth of the artificial carious lesions. But, it is also important to emphasize other preventive methods in the prevention and/or reversal of caries as the child formula dentifrices could not completely remineralize the carious lesions.

 
   References Top

1.
Petersen PE, Lennon MA. Effective use of fluorides for the prevention of dental caries in the 21 st century: The WHO approach. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:319-21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Adair SM. The dynamics of change: Epidemiology and mechanism of dental disease. In: Pinkham JR, editor. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy through Adolescence. 3 rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Publishers; 1988. p. 252-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Anderson P, Hector MP, Rampersad MA. Critical pH in resting and stimulated whole saliva in groups of children and adults. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001;11:266-73.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Shellis RP, Duckworth RM. Studies on the cariostatic mechanisms of fluoride. Int Dent J 1994;44:263-73.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Davies RM, Ellwood RP, Davies GM. The rational use of fluoride toothpaste. Int J Dent Hyg 2003;1:3-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pessan JP, Silva SM, Buzalaf MA. Evaluation of the total fluoride intake of 4-7-year-old children from diet and dentifrice. J Appl Oral Sci 2003;11:150-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Guidelines on Fluoride Therapy. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry reference manual 2009-2010. Pediatr Dent  2010;33:153-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Stephen KW, Damato FA, Strang R. An in situ enamel section model for assessment of enamel re/demineralization potential. J Dent Res 1992;71:856-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Itthagarun A, Wei SH, Wefel JS. De/remineralization from different commercial toothpastes: A pH-cycling study. Int Dent J 1997;47:321-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Damato FA, Strang R, Stephen KW. Effect of fluoride concentration on remineralization of carious enamel: An in vitro pH-cycling study. Caries Res 1990;24:174-80.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Nelson DG, Coote GE, Shariati M, Featherstone JD. High resolution fluoride profiles of artificial in vitro lesions treated with fluoride dentifrices and mouthrinses during pH cycling conditions. Caries Res 1992;26:254-62.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Tyler JE, Poole DF, Stack MV, Dowell TB. Superficial fluoride levels and response to in-vitro caries-like lesion induction of enamel from Bristol (U.K.) and Birmingham (U.K.) human deciduous teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1986;31:201-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hicks J, Wild T, Flaitz CM, Seybold S. Fluoride varnishes and caries development in primary tooth enamel: An in vitro study. ASDC J Dent Child 2001;68:304-10, 300.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Thaveesangpanich P, Itthagarun A, King NM, Wefel JS. The effects of child formula toothpastes on enamel caries using two in vitro pH-cycling models. Int Dent J 2005;55:217-23.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Thaveesangpanich P, Itthagarun A, King NM, Wefel JS, Tay FR. In vitro model for evaluating the effect of child formula toothpastes on artificial caries in primary dentition enamel. Am J Dent 2005;18:212-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Itthagarun A, King NM, Rana R. Effects of child formula dentifrices on artificial caries like lesions using in vitro pH-cycling: Preliminary results. Int Dent J 2007;57:307-13.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
ten Cate JM, Duijsters PP. Alternating demineralization and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions. Caries Res 1982;16:201-10.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Aoba T. The effect of fluoride on apatite structure and growth. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:136-53.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
ten Cate JM. Current concepts on the theories of the mechanism of action of fluoride. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:325-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kumar VL, Itthagarun A, King NM. The effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on remineralization of artificial caries-like lesions: An in vitro study. Aust Dent J 2008;53:34-40.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Rana R, Itthagarun A, King NM. Effects of dentifrices on artificial caries like lesions: An in vitro pH cycling study. Int Dent J 2007;57:243-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
de Rooij JF, Arends J, Kolar Z. Diffusion of monofluorophosphate in whole bovine enamel at pH 7. Caries Res 1981;15:363-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Rølla G, Saxegaard E. Critical evaluation of the composition and use of topical fluorides, with emphasis on the role of calcium fluoride in caries inhibition. J Dent Res 1990;69:780-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Stephen KW. Fluoride toothpastes, rinses, and tablets. Adv Dent Res 1994;8:185-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Stookey GK, DePaola PF, Featherstone JD, Fejerskov O, Möller IJ, Rotberg S, et al. A critical review of the relative anticaries efficacy of sodium fluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrices. Caries Res 1993;27:337-60.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Beiswanger BB, Lehnhoff RW, Mallatt ME, Mau MS, Stookey GK. A clinical evaluation of the relative cariostatic effect of dentifrices containing sodium fluoride or sodium monofluorophosphate. ASDC J Dent Child 1989;56:270-60.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Beiswanger BB, Stookey GK. The comparative clinical cariostatic efficacy of sodium fluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrices: A review of trials. ASDC J Dent Child 1989;56:337-47.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Lu KH, Ruhlman CD, Chung KL, Sturzenberger OP, Lehnhoff RW. A three-year clinical comparison of a sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice with sodium fluoride dentifrices on dental caries in children. ASDC J Dent Child 1987;54:241-4.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Marks RG, Conti AJ, Moorhead JE, Cancro L, D'Agostino RB. Results from a three-year caries clinical trial comparing NaF and SMFP fluoride formulations. Int Dent J 1994;44:275-85.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Stephen KW, Chestnutt IG, Jacobson AP, McCall DR, Chesters RK, Huntington E, et al. The effect of NaF and SMFP toothpastes on three-year caries increments in adolescents. Int Dent J 1994;44:287-95.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Pearce EI, Dibdin GH. The diffusion and enzymic hydrolysis of monofluorophosphate in dental plaque. J Dent Res 1995;74:691-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
White DJ. Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with artificial caries. I. Effects on early lesions: F uptake, surface hardening and remineralization. Caries Res 1987;21:126-40.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Ekambaram M, Itthagarun A, King NM. Comparison of the remineralizing potential of child formula dentifrices. Int J Paediatr Dent 2011;21:132-40.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Toda S, Featherstone JD. Effects of fluoride dentifrices on enamel lesion formation. J Dent Res 2008;87:224-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Blinkhorn AS, Kay EJ. A clinical study in children: Comparing the anticaries effect of three fluoride dentifrices. Clin Prev Dent 1988;10:14-6.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
DePaola PF, Soparkar PM, Triol C, Volpe AR, Garcia L, Duffy J, et al. The relative anticaries effectiveness of sodium monofluorophosphate and sodium fluoride as contained in currently available dentifrice formulations. Am J Dent 1993;6:S7-12.  Back to cited text no. 36
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Effects of Fluoride on Two Chemical Models of Enamel Demineralization
Ollie Yiru Yu,May Lei Mei,Irene Shuping Zhao,Edward Chin-Man Lo,Chun-Hung Chu
Materials. 2017; 10(11): 1245
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1883    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded204    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal