|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 332-336
Three-dimensional facial analyses of Indian and Malaysian women
Preethi Kusugal1, Zarir Ruttonji1, Roopa Gowda2, Ladusingh Rajpurohit3, Pritam Lad1, Ritu1
1 Department of Prosthodontics, Maratha Mandal's N.G. Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
2 Orthodontist, Private Practice, Mysore, Karnataka, India
3 Deparment of Public Health Dentistry, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Web Publication||31-Jul-2015|
Department of Prosthodontics, Maratha Mandal's N.G. Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belgaum, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Context: Facial measurements serve as a valuable tool in the treatment planning of maxillofacial rehabilitation, orthodontic treatment, and orthognathic surgeries. The esthetic guidelines of face are still based on neoclassical canons, which were used in the ancient art. These canons are considered to be highly subjective, and there is ample evidence in the literature, which raises such questions as whether or not these canons can be applied for the modern population. Aims: This study was carried out to analyze the facial features of Indian and Malaysian women by using three-dimensional (3D) scanner and thus determine the prevalence of neoclassical facial esthetic canons in both the groups. Subjects and Methods: The study was carried out on 60 women in the age range of 18-25 years, out of whom 30 were Indian and 30 Malaysian. As many as 16 facial measurements were taken by using a noncontact 3D scanner. Statistical Analysis Used: Unpaired t-test was used for comparison of facial measurements between Indian and Malaysian females. Two-tailed Fisher exact test was used to determine the prevalence of neoclassical canons. Results: Orbital Canon was prevalent in 80% of Malaysian women; the same was found only in 16% of Indian women (P = 0.00013). About 43% of Malaysian women exhibited orbitonasal canon (P = 0.0470) whereas nasoaural canon was prevalent in 73% of Malaysian and 33% of Indian women (P = 0.0068). Conclusions: Orbital, orbitonasal, and nasoaural canon were more prevalent in Malaysian women. Facial profile canon, nasooral, and nasofacial canons were not seen in either group. Though some canons provide guidelines in esthetic analyses of face, complete reliance on these canons is not justifiable.
Keywords: Facial analyses, facial measurements, neoclassical canons, three-dimensional scanner
|How to cite this article:|
Kusugal P, Ruttonji Z, Gowda R, Rajpurohit L, Lad P, Ritu. Three-dimensional facial analyses of Indian and Malaysian women. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6:332-6
| Introduction|| |
The face symbolizes identity of a person. Right from the birth of an individual, the face plays an important role in social interaction. The uniqueness of face helps in determining the person's origin and race. The facial features and proportions differ with race.  The concepts of harmony, symmetry, equality, and proportion of face have been studied from ages by various artists and surgeons. Facial proportions have been idealized in ancient art. ,, The study of beauty became a formal discipline in 15 th century BC. In the prerenaissance era, many body proportions were used by the artists to achieve esthetics in their work. It was in the renaissance period that more importance was given to facial proportions. , Renaissance artists emphasized that facial beauty is rooted in symmetric and balanced proportions.  Polycleitus, a Greek sculptor, was the first to define canons as rules to be followed in the artwork. , Leonardo Da Vinci, Vitruvius, Bergmuller, and Albrecht Durer extensively reported on canons and have applied these canons in their art. ,,,,,,, However, these canons were more objective and do not establish standard values for the specific population. ,, The most commonly used canons are listed in [Table 1].
Facial parameters are an indispensable tool for maxillofacial rehabilitation, pre- and post-treatment evaluation in orthognathic surgeries and orthodontic treatment. ,,, Qualitative and quantitative information of the face is useful in diagnosis and treatment planning of patients. 
Quantitative analysis of face can be done by anthropometry in which direct facial measurements are taken using calipers or indirect ones such as two-dimensional photographs and three-dimensional (3D) scanning systems, which include laser scanning, cone beam computed tomography, and 3D stereo photogrammetry. ,, In the recent times, noninvasive 3D scanning has become more popular and reliable method of analyzing craniofacial complex. ,,,,,,
A 3D scanner is a device, which works on the basis of conversion of a real object into digital form. First, the scanner acquires data of the shape and dimensions of the scanned object with the aid of different technologies.  The data are then processed and used in prosthetics and orthotics.
This study was carried out to analyze the facial features of Indian and Malaysian women between the age group of 18 and 25 years, and to determine the prevalence of neoclassical canons in both the groups. A 3D scanner was used to take the facial measurements. The study aimed at establishing realistic values of facial measurements in Indian and Malaysian women so that they can be used beneficially in various treatment procedures.
| Subjects and Methods|| |
The study was carried out on 60 women in the age range of 18-25 years out of whom 30 were Indian and 30 Malaysian. A total of 16 facial measurements were carried out 12 linear and 4 horizontal [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
|Figure 1: Frontal view-abbreviations: Tr-trichion, g-glabella, n-nasion, en-endocanthion, ex-exocanthion, zy-zygion, sn-subnasale, al-alare, ch-cheilion, st-stomion, gn-gnathion|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Lateral view-abbreviations: Prn-pronasale, ls-labrale superioris, li-labrale inferioris, sa-superaurale, sba-subaurale|
Click here to view
All of the participants had class I skeletal relationship with no history of trauma and injury to the face, no gross facial asymmetry, no history of orthodontic treatment. Demographic data including age, place of birth, and ancestral origin were obtained along with informed patient consent to participate in the study.
Comet light emitting diode (LED) 3D scanner (Steinbichler Optotechnik GmbH, Germany), which works on photographic principle was used to scan the subjects. It is a noncontact optical scanner with camera resolution (dpi) of 1600 × 1200, measuring field 400 mm, measuring volume 400 × 300 × 250 mm, and point-to-point distance 259 μm. The object was scanned from several angles and the scans were subsequently combined to create a digitized 3D image of the subject. During scanning, the position of the patient head was standardized and the basic parameters of the surroundings namely temperature, humidity, and lighting were kept unchanged.
The data were analyzed using Steinbichler Comet plus software (Steinbichler Optotechnik GmbH, Germany). The facial landmark identification was performed by an orthodontist.
| Results|| |
Sixteen facial measurements of Indian and Malaysian women were compared. Significant differences were seen in all the facial measurements. The statistical values are presented in [Table 2]. The prevalence of neoclassical canons is presented in [Table 3].
|Table 2: Comparison of facial measurements between Indian and Malaysian women |
Click here to view
Facial profile canon
The facial profile canon was not valid in both Malaysian as well as Indian women. The forehead height was found to be greater than mid face height (tr-n > n-sn) in all Malaysian women, whereas the same was found to be true in 96% of Indian women. The forehead height was also greater than lower face height (tr-n > sn-gn) in both the groups. Midface height (n-sn > sn-gn) was found to be greater than lower face height in 56% women of both groups.
The orbital canon was prevalent in 80% of Malaysian women whereas it was seen in only 16% of Indian women with P = 0.00013.
The orbitonasal canon was prevalent in 43% of Malaysian population with P = 0.0470 but not found in Indian women at all. The interfissure width was lesser than nasal width (en-en < al-al) in all Indian women.
The nasooral canon was not seen in either women group.
The nasofacial canon too was not seen in either women group.
The nasoaural canon was prevalent in 73% of Malaysian and 33% of Indian women with P = 0.0068.
Nasoaural canon was prevalent in 73% of Malaysian women. The variant of nasoaural canon (n-sn < sa-sba) was observed in 63% of Indian women.
Wang et al. compared the validity of neoclassical canons of facial proportion in Chinese and North American Caucasians population. The study revealed that horizontal measurements were significantly greater in Chinese population with wider intercanthal distance, short palpebral fissure, wider nose, and a small mouth width; and forehead height greater than the lower face. 
Steinbichler Comet LED 3D scanner was used in this study for scanning subjects. It is a noninvasive, safe procedure and does not require physical contact with the subjects. Toth and Zivcak compared outputs of the Steinbichler Comet LED 3D optical scanner and the creaform EXAscan laser scanner; and concluded that the scanners using white light (Comet, Atos) have greater accuracy than other types of 3D scanners. 
In the present study, the realistic values of face that could be beneficially used in orthodontic, orthognathic, and reconstructive surgeries of face were established successfully. The validity of the five facial canons was assessed in both Indian and Malaysian women. Only two out of the six canons were prevalent in Malaysian women whereas the Indian women exhibited none of them.
Facial features change with origin, ethnicity, and culture. Many anthropometric studies have been carried out in various ethnic groups to analyze and measure the facial proportions. Farkas et al. conducted an anthropometric study of facial morphology across 25 countries among various ethnic groups where the North American women population was used as the reference group. More similarities were found between European Caucasians and North Americans and between Asians and Africans. 
In the present study, facial analyses of Indian and Malaysian women were carried out. The total face height and forehead height was found to be more in Malaysian women. The nose was slightly longer and broader and lips thicker in Malaysian women. The inter fissure width was significantly more in Malaysian women than in Indian women. The eyes and ears were smaller and face wider in Malaysian women as compared to Indian women.
Husein et al. carried out anthropometric and esthetic analyses on Indian American women (IAW) and North American white women (NAWW). The study revealed that facial measurements in IAW were much different from NAWW with larger and wider set eyes, a smaller midface, and a smaller nose with greater tip rotation, smaller ears, and a larger mouth. Attractive IAW displayed many measurements typical of average IAW and several measurements that reflect average NAWW values. 
Choe et al. carried out anthropometric analysis on Korean American women's face (KAW). The study concluded that KAW facial anthropometric measurements were very different from NAWW, but the attractive KAW facial features reflected many similar features of NAWW face, and it was also found that neoclassical canons were not valid in KAW population. 
The neoclassical canons dominated the Western art during the renaissance era. In the 20 th century, anthropometrist Farkas, et al. challenged the classical canons by measuring the facial proportions of 200 North American Caucasians women. The study concluded that some of the canons are nothing more than artistic idealizations. , However, the esthetic guidelines are still based on these canons. 
In this study, the prevalence of neoclassical canon was assessed for Indian and Malaysian women. However, neither Indian nor Malaysian women exhibited facial profile canon. Orbital canon was observed in 80% of Malaysian women, whereas only 16% of Indian women showed this feature. The variant of orbital canon en-en < ex-en was observed in 76% of Indian women. Orbitonasal Canon was seen in 43% Malaysian women, however, it was not found in a single Indian woman. The variant of orbitonasal canon en-en < al-al was observed in all the Indian women.
The nasooral canon was found neither in Indian nor Malaysian women. The variant of nasooral canon ch-ch < 1.5 (al-al) was observed in 56% of Indian women and 73% of Malaysian women. Nasofacial canon was not witnessed in both the population. The variant of nasofacial canon al-al > ¼ (zy-zy) was observed in 73% of both the females.
| Conclusions|| |
The study showed variation in all the facial measurements in Indian and Malaysian women. The realistic values for facial measurements of both the groups were successfully established. The same can be used in diagnosis and treatment planning in various dental procedures. The prevalence of orbital, orbitonasal, and nasoaural canons was more in Malaysian women. Though some of these canons provide valuable guidelines in the esthetic analysis of face, complete reliance on these canons is not justifiable. Neoclassical canons are more of an artistic idealizations rather than realistic values.
| References|| |
Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, Alt KW, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G, et al.
International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:615-46.
Wang D, Qian G, Zhang M, Farkas LG. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997;21:265-9.
Bozkir MG, Karakas P, Oguz O. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:212-9.
Zimbler MS, Ham JW. Aesthetic facial analysis. In: Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA, Haughey BH, Richardson MA, Robbins KT, et al
., editors. Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 4 th
ed. Pennsylvennia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 513-28.
Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 1. Concepts and canons. Dent Update 2008;35:102-4, 106.
Vegter F, Hage JJ. Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:1090-6.
Husein OF, Sepehr A, Garg R, Sina-Khadiv M, Gattu S, Waltzman J, et al.
Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman's face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1825-31.
Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Levin LS, Forrest CR. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002;26:64-9.
Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000;24:179-84.
Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: Revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:328-38.
Cvicelova M, Benus R, Lysakova L, Molnarova A, Borovska Z. Occurrence of neoclassical facial canons in Caucasian primary school pupils and university students. Bratisl Lek Listy 2007;108:480-5.
Choe KS, Sclafani AP, Litner JA, Yu GP, Romo T 3 rd
. The Korean American woman's face: Anthropometric measurements and quantitative analysis of facial aesthetics. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:244-52.
Jayaratne YS, Deutsch CK, McGrath CP, Zwahlen RA. Are neoclassical canons valid for southern Chinese faces? PLoS One 2012;7:e52593.
Othman SA, Ahmad R, Asi SM, Ismail NH, Rahman ZA. Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of facial morphology in adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate, and patients without clefts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;52:208-13.
Al-Khatib AR. Facial three dimensional surface imaging: An overview. Arch Orofac Sci 2010;5:1-8.
Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO, Ren Y. Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems. Forensic Sci Int 2011;207:127-34.
Heike CL, Upson K, Stuhaug E, Weinberg SM. 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: A practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head Face Med 2010;6:18.
Othman SA, Ahmad R, Mericant AF, Jamaludin M. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera. Aust Orthod J 2013;29:58-65.
Sforza C, de Menezes M, Ferrario V. Soft- and hard-tissue facial anthropometry in three dimensions: What's new. J Anthropol Sci 2013;91:159-84.
Deli R, Galantucci LM, Laino A, D'Alessio R, Di Gioia E, Savastano C, et al.
Three-dimensional methodology for photogrammetric acquisition of the soft tissues of the face: A new clinical-instrumental protocol. Prog Orthod 2013;14:32.
Toth T, Zivcak J. A comparison of the outputs of 3D scanners. J Procedia Engineering 2014;69:393-401.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Neoclassical canons of facial beauty: do we see the deviations?
| ||Andrej Pavlic,Magda Trinajstic Zrinski,Visnja Katic,Stjepan Spalj |
| ||Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Assessment of age- and sex-related changes in baggy lower eyelids using a novel objective image analysis method: Orbital gray scale analysis
| ||Seong-Jin Jo,Hyung Su Kim,Jung Tae Park,Bo Ri Kim,Sang Woong Youn |
| ||Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Comparison between Obando´s anthropometric formula and Mondelli´s formula to estimate central incisor width.
| ||Sara Rodríguez-Alayza,Gustavo Obando-Pereda |
| ||Journal of Oral Research. 2016; 5(3): 114 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The impact of body mass index on craniofacial parameters
| ||Anna Nádadyová,Eva tefánková,Martin Samohýl |
| ||Kontakt. 2016; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|