Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 275  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 170-175  

Enamel morphology after microabrasion with experimental compounds


1 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas - FOP/Unicamp, São Paulo, Brazil
2 Clinical Practice, São Paulo, Brazil
3 Restorative Dentistry, Clinical Practice, São Paulo, Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil

Date of Web Publication4-May-2015

Correspondence Address:
Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, P. O. Box 52, University of Campinas -UNICAMP 13414-903, Piracicaba, SP
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.156038

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Enamel microabrasion is an esthetic treatment for removing superficial stains or defects of enamel. Aim: This study evaluated the roughness after enamel microabrasion using experimental microabrasive systems. Materials and Methods: One hundred and ten samples (5 × 5 mm) were obtained from bovine incisors and divided into 11 groups (n = 10) in accordance with the treatment: Microabrasion using 6.6% hydrochloric acid (HCl) or 35% phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ) associated with aluminum oxide (AlO 3 ) or pumice (Pum) with active application (using rubber cup coupled with a micro-motor of low rotation) or passive application (just placing the mixture on the enamel surface); just the use of acids in a passive application (negative control), and a group without treatment (positive control). Roughness analysis was performed before and after treatments. The statistical analysis used analysis of variance (PROC MIXED), Tukey-Kramer and Dunnet tests (P < 0.05). Representative specimens were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: There was no significant difference between the acids used (P = 0.0510) and the applications (P = 0.8989). All of the treated groups were statistically different from the positive control. When using passive application, the use of HCl + AlO 3 resulted in higher roughness when compared with HCl + Pum. Additionally, this treatment was statistically different from the passive application of H 3 PO 4 (negative control) (P < 0.05). However, SEM analysis showed that the treatment with AlO 3 resulted in an enamel surface with a more polished aspect when compared with Pum. Conclusion: AlO 3 may be a suitable particle for use in microabrasive systems.

Keywords: Enamel, microabrasion, roughness


How to cite this article:
Pini NI, Costa R, Bertoldo CE, Aguiar FH, Lovadino JR, Lima DN. Enamel morphology after microabrasion with experimental compounds. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6:170-5

How to cite this URL:
Pini NI, Costa R, Bertoldo CE, Aguiar FH, Lovadino JR, Lima DN. Enamel morphology after microabrasion with experimental compounds. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Aug 12];6:170-5. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2015/6/2/170/156038


   Introduction Top


Enamel microabrasion is a procedure used for removing a superficial layer of enamel that has some alteration of color and/or texture. [1] This procedure is performed utilizing an association of an erosive agent (phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ) or hydrochloric acid (HCl)) and an abrasive agent (pumice (Pum) or silica particles). [2],[3],[4] With the technique, a sub layer of enamel with normal characteristics is exposed. As the enamel wear is minimal, microabrasion is considered a safe and conservative procedure, when correctly prescribed. [4],[5],[6],[7]

Recently, scientific studies have been performed to improve microabrasion and to know its effects on enamel. [8],[9],[10],[11],[12] Initially, the acid used for microabrasion was 18% HCl; today, it is recognized that this concentration is considered erosive and toxic. Currently, the same acid is employed at a lower concentration and containing silica in commercial formulations. [5],[6],[7] Another combination used for the microabrasion technique is 35% H 3 PO 4 coupled with Pum, in equal parts. [13] This mixture is advantageous because of its low cost and accessibility. However, it is subject to variations when the operator mixes the compounds. [5],[8]

The effects of microabrasion on enamel are related to the compounds, both erosive and abrasive, and to the mechanical pressure exerted when using microabrasion cups in slow-speed hand pieces. [14],[15],[16] The common effects include increased roughness values, which are reestablished by saliva over a period between 7 and 15 days. [8],[9],[11] In relation to the morphology, microscopic evaluations have shown that microabrasion causes alterations to the enamel surface, similar to the conditioning patterns caused by H 3 PO 4 , to include exposure of the interprismatic spaces. [17] Therefore, the enamel characteristics resulting from the technique are most likely related to the acid concentration and pH, in addition to the time and pressure of instrumentation and application. [14],[17] The abrasive is also relevant, as Pum is believed to present excessive abrasiveness and deep erosion when compared to other abrasive systems. [18]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the acids (hydrochloric and phosphoric) in conjunction with different experimental abrasive mixtures on enamel morphology by means of roughness analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).


   Materials and Methods Top


Preparation of specimens

Bovine incisor teeth were selected and stored in a formaldehyde solution for at least 1-month. After the coronary portion was separated using a double-faced diamond disk (KG Sorensen, Ind. Com. Ltda.; Barueri, SP, Brazil), 110 enamel/dentin slabs (5 × 5 × 3 mm) were obtained using a precision saw (Isomet 1000; Buehler, Illinois, USA) and a high-concentration diamond disk (4" ×012 × ½, Buehler, Illinois, USA). The enamel surface of the blocks was flattened in a circular polishing machine (Aropol E, Arotec, Cotia; Sγo Paulo, SP, Brazil), under water cooling, using the following: Silicon carbide papers of decreasing granulation (#300, #600 and #1200), felts, and diamond pastes of 1, 1/2 and 1/4 μm granulation greased with a specific oil (Arotec, Cotia; SP, Brazil). Between the polishing steps and after the final polishing, all slabs were cleaned for 15 min in an ultrasonic device (Marconi, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) that contained distilled water.

Surface treatment

The following ingredients were used to fabricate the experimental microabrasive products:

  • 6.6% hydrochloric acid (HCl - Drogral-Piracicaba, Sγo Paulo/Brazil)
  • 35% H 3 PO 4 (H 3 PO 4 - Ultradent Products - Utah, USA)
  • Aluminum oxide (AlO 3 -NMartis - Colombo, Paranα/Brazil)
  • Pumice (SS White LTDA, Rio de Janeiro, RJ/Brazil).
The specimens were randomly divided into 11 groups based on the acid and abrasive used and the application technique [Table 1].
Table 1: Groups of study


Click here to view


All of the microabrasive products were formed using equal parts of each component as measured using a dosage spoon (0.240 g). The specific treatments were placed on the enamel surface with a syringe until the sample was covered; the amount required was 0.0200 g for the groups treated with acid and abrasive and 0.0150 g for the groups treated with acid only. The application of the acids in a passive form was performed to clearly identify the effects of the experimental mixtures on enamel, with these serving as negative controls. All of the surface treatments were performed with 10 applications for 10 s each. After each application, the enamel surface was rinsed and dried for 10 s using a dental sprayer and compressed air, respectively. The control group (positive) did not receive treatment.

Enamel roughness analysis

The enamel roughness regression analysis (Ra) was analyzed, using a profilometer roughness tester (Mitutoyo Surfitest 211, Sγo Paulo, SP, Brazil) before and after the microabrasive treatment. A diamond stylus was used to measure the surface roughness, using a cut-off of 0.25 mm and speed of 0.5 mm/s, under a constant load (5 N). The numeric values representing the roughness profile were computed and represented as Ra. Three readings were made in three different directions on the enamel surface, with the mean values of the measuring points calculated.

Scanning electron microscopy

For SEM analysis (JEOL.JSM 5600 LV, Tokyo, Japan), representative specimens from each group were placed on an acrylic stub under aluminum tape (3M Adhesives Ltd., St. Paul, MN, USA) and were sputter coated (Balzers - SCD 050 sputter coter, Germany) with a thin layer of gold, equivalent to 10−6 mm, and under vacuum, to increase the surface reflectance. Photomicrographs (×4000) of representative areas of the specimens were obtained.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained were submitted to statistical analysis using analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) for repeated measures, followed by Tukey's and Dunnett's tests. The significance level was 5%.


   Results Top


[Table 2] shows that all of the experimental groups presented an increase in the roughness values, with statistically significant differences when comparing the initial and final values. Additionally, there were no statistical differences between the acids used (P = 0.0510) or the application forms (P = 0.8989) with regards to roughness. However, the association between HCl and AlO 3 presented the highest mean value of surface roughness when applied in the passive form, which was statistically different from the association of Pum with the same acid and application. The comparison with negative controls showed a difference between the association of HCl with AlO 3 (passive application) and H 3 PO 4 , showing the erosive power of the HCl and the inability of the AlO 3 to reduce the effects of HCl on enamel roughness. The control group (positive control) was statistically different from all of the experimental groups and the negative controls, proving the erosive action of the acids and the microabrasive mixtures on enamel roughness.
Table 2: Enamel roughness in micrometers, means (SD) in the analysis before and after treatments


Click here to view


Scanning electron microscopy images showed different conditioning patterns for the different acids and microabrasive systems. Treatment with HCl in the microabrasive mixtures [Figure 1] did not present any specific conditioning pattern, with no evidence of the prism core (type I) or the prism periphery (type II), as found with the H 3 PO 4 treatment, in which the type I [Figure 2] conditioning pattern was found. The combination of HCl with abrasive particles and active application [Figure 1]a and c] resulted in a polished enamel surface, most noticeably with the association of HCl and AlO 3 [Figure 1]a]. With the passive application [Figure 1]b and d], HCl + abrasives showed a tendency to exhibiting the demineralization characteristics as seen in [Figure 3]a. Treatment with H 3 PO 4 and Pum [Figure 2]c and d] presented the conditioning pattern type I, which was also found with the treatment using just H 3 PO 4 [Figure 3]b]. The association between H 3 PO 4 and AlO 3 tended to present enamel conditioning without complete exposition of the prism cores, showing the action of this abrasive in reducing the erosive powder of the acid. Regarding the treatments with just the acids [Figure 3], H 3 PO 4 exhibited more demineralization than HCl.
Figure 1: Scanning electron microscopy photomicrography for the groups treated with hydrochloric acid (HCl) in the microabrasive system treatment using the association between HCl and aluminum oxide (a and b) or Pumice (c and d) with passive active (a and c) or passive (b and d) modes of application

Click here to view
Figure 2: Scanning electron microscopy photomicrography for the groups treated with phosphoric acid (H3PO4) in the microabrasive system treatment using the association between H3PO4 and aluminum oxide (a and b) or Pumice (c and d) with passive active (a and c) or passive (b and d) modes of application

Click here to view
Figure 3: Scanning electron microscopy photomicrography for the groups treated with just the placement of the acids treatment hydrochloric acid (a) and phosphoric acid (b)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Enamel microabrasion has become accepted as a conservative, nonrestorative method of improving the appearance of teeth with superficial defects or alteration of color. [2],[3],[5],[6],[19] The technique is based on mild acid etching in combination with a rotary application of an abrasive medium. [16] Studies have suggested the existence of an "abrosion effect," whereby the erosive action of the acid coupled with an abrasive action to compact the mineralized tissue within the organic area. Through this process, the outer layer of prism-rich enamel is replaced with a densely compacted and prism-free region. [5],[6],[7],[20],[21] However, the enamel surface after treatment presents with alterations in roughness and microhardness. [8],[9],[10],[11] The results on this present study demonstrated that all experimental microabrasive systems and acids caused an increase in superficial enamel roughness, as each experimental agent showed specific enamel conditioning when observed under SEM.

According to [Table 2], the roughness means increased after the microabrasion treatments (active application), and after the passive application of the microabrasive systems or acids, as related in other studies. [8],[9],[11] These results in all experimental groups, including the passive application of the acids, may be explained due to the erosive action of the acids used. [17],[22] This action is responsible for enamel demineralization, as visualized in the SEM images. Although the microscopy analysis shows different conditioning patterns between the acids used, in which H 3 PO 4 presents major evidence of demineralization with marked exposition of the prism cores, [23] the absence of statistical differences for roughness in relation to the acids used (P = 0.0510) did not allow for defining which acid (35% H 3 PO 4 or 6.6% HCl) had the greater erosive action on enamel.

In relation to the abrasive compounds used, AlO 3 in combination with both acids [Figure 1] and [Figure 2] resulted in a more polished and glossy enamel surface that was more likely to be similar to the surface found in the control group [Figure 4] when observed under SEM. This polished surface should be a result of the "abrosion effect," as related by Croll (1997). [20] This effect can be explained due to the effect of the polish conferred by the AlO 3 , which has a constant grain size (60 μ) and is commonly used for finishing and polishing restorative materials and enamel surfaces. [24]
Figure 4: Scanning electron microscopy photomicrography for the control group. Control group without observation of any conditioning pattern

Click here to view


As part of the microabrasion technique, it is important to perform a final polish using abrasive materials (felt disks and diamond paste) to finalize the esthetic appearance and minimize the surface roughness of the enamel, [7],[9],[11] since greater surface roughness leads to greater plaque accumulation. [25] Therefore, the technique using AlO 3 would obtain a polished enamel surface, which might reduce the clinical time for the technique, as it could eliminate the polishing stage. While the enamel roughness increased when using this abrasive, the literature is emphatic in demonstrating the remineralization effect of saliva in minimizing the roughness and microhardness alterations of enamel after microabrasion. [8],[9],[11],[26]

With both application modes, the SEM analysis showed that HCl, in a low concentration, combined with AlO 3 or Pum [Figure 1], resulted in an enamel surface that was less eroded when compared to surfaces treated with H 3 PO 4 . This may be explained due to the conditioning pattern observed with this acid, in which there was no marked exposition of the core or periphery of the prisms. Even though there were no statistically significant differences between the application forms of the microabrasives (P = 0.8989), the active application using special rubber cups in a slow-speed hand piece is well defined in the literature as being important for the microabrasion technique. [14],[15],[27]

With regards to the passive application of the microabrasive mixtures containing AlO 3 , as the roughness analysis for its use with HCl showed higher and statistically significant roughness means in relation to the Pum for the same acid and application form (P < 0.05), it can be suggested that the Pum, as an abrasive, may neutralize or reduce the erosive action of the acids better when compared to the AlO 3 . However, regarding the SEM analysis, less invasive enamel surface conditioning was noted with the use of HCl when compared to the use of H 3 PO 4 , even considering that the AlO 3 may present a neutralizing action. Even so, the association between HCl and AlO 3 may be suitable for use, considering that the enamel roughness is corrected over time with exposure to saliva, as shown in in vitro[9],[11] or in situ[8],[26] studies. The improvement in roughness due to saliva is due to it containing a buffering capacity that may be improved by specific remineralizing agents, such as fluoride. [28],[29]

When considering the results obtained from this study with the clinical procedure of microabrasion, the passive application of the microabrasive systems, which resulted in an increase in the roughness values when compared to the control group, shows that the clinician should be careful in not overly exposing the enamel surface to the microabrasive compounds without mechanical application. This finding suggests that the use of mechanical application helps to guarantee the scattering and renewing of the acid on the enamel, without allowing the erosive substance to remain on the tooth surface for too long. This concern is especially important in the case of patients with fluorosis stains or remineralized white spots, which are common after finish orthodontic treatment. [4],[7] In these cases, the clinician should perform the procedure individually on each tooth, ensuring the renovation of the microabrasive mixture over the enamel surface to be treated, thereby reducing any extraneous erosive action, which is evident when the compounds are only placed on enamel.

The results of the present study, as well as those found in the literature, indicate that the microabrasive technique is a conservative esthetic procedure that may be safely indicated, although it causes alterations on the enamel surface. Therefore, it is important to study the technique, the microabrasive compounds and their effects on enamel, in order to reverse these effects and to obtain the most minimally invasive technique possible.


   Conclusion Top


In conclusion, the results found in this study demonstrate that enamel microabrasion with different compounds results in an increase in the surface roughness of enamel. The association of HCl with AlO 3 resulted in an increase in surface roughness, when analyzed by SEM The passive application of the microabrasive systems enamel was an important point to be evaluated, since the results showed the care that must be taken when using the technique, in order to avoid the extraneous erosive action of the acid on the enamel surface.

 
   References Top

1.
Croll TP. Enamel microabrasion: The technique. Quintessence Int 1989;20:395-400.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sundfeld RH, Franco LM, Gonçalves RS, de Alexandre RS, Machado LS, Neto DS. Accomplishing esthetics using enamel microabrasion and bleaching - A case report. Oper Dent 2014;39:223-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wang Y, Sa Y, Liang S, Jiang T. Minimally invasive treatment for esthetic management of severe dental fluorosis: A case report. Oper Dent 2013;38:358-62.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Benbachir N, Ardu S, Krejci I. Indications and limits of the microabrasion technique. Quintessence Int 2007;38:811-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pini NI, Sundfeld-Neto D, Aguiar FH, Sundfeld RH, Martins LR, Lovadino JR, et al. Enamel microabrasion: An overview of clinical and scientific considerations. World J Clin Cases 2015;3:34-41.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sundfeld RH, Sundfeld-Neto D, Machado LS, Franco LM, Fagundes TC, Briso AL. Microabrasion in tooth enamel discoloration defects: Three cases with long-term follow-ups. J Appl Oral Sci 2014;22:347-54.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sundfeld RH, Croll TP, Briso AL, de Alexandre RS, Sundfeld Neto D. Considerations about enamel microabrasion after 18 years. Am J Dent 2007;20:67-72.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Pini NI, Lima DA, Sundfeld RH, Ambrosano GM, Aguiar FH, Lovadino JR. In situ assessment of the saliva effect on enamel morphology after microabrasion technique. Braz J Oral Sci 2014;13:187-92.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bertoldo CE, Pini NI, Miranda DA, Catelan A, Ambrosano GM, Lima DA, et al. Physicochemical properties of enamel after microabrasion technique. J Res Dent 2014;2:176-88.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Rodrigues MC, Mondelli RF, Oliveira GU, Franco EB, Baseggio W, Wang L. Minimal alterations on the enamel surface by micro-abrasion: In vitro roughness and wear assessments. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:112-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Fragoso LS, Lima DA, de Alexandre RS, Bertoldo CE, Aguiar FH, Lovadino JR. Evaluation of physical properties of enamel after microabrasion, polishing, and storage in artificial saliva. Biomed Mater 2011;6:035001.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Meireles SS, Andre Dde A, Leida FL, Bocangel JS, Demarco FF. Surface roughness and enamel loss with two microabrasion techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10:58-65.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kamp AA. Removal of white spot lesions by controlled acid-pumice abrasion. J Clin Orthod 1989;23:690-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Paic M, Sener B, Schug J, Schmidlin PR. Effects of microabrasion on substance loss, surface roughness, and colorimetric changes on enamel in vitro. Quintessence Int 2008;39:517-22.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zuanon AC, Santos-Pinto L, Azevedo ER, Lima LM. Primary tooth enamel loss after manual and mechanical microabrasion. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:420-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Schmidlin PR, Göhring TN, Schug J, Lutz F. Histological, morphological, profilometric and optical changes of human tooth enamel after microabrasion. Am J Dent 2003;16 Spec No: 4A-8A.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Tong LS, Pang MK, Mok NY, King NM, Wei SH. The effects of etching, micro-abrasion, and bleaching on surface enamel. J Dent Res 1993;72:67-71.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Honório HM, Rios D, Santos CF, Magalhães AC, Delbem AC, Buzalaf MA, et al. Cross-sectional microhardness of human enamel subjected to erosive, cariogenic or combined erosive/cariogenic challenges. Caries Res 2010;44:29-32.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Nahsan FP, da Silva LM, Baseggio W, Franco EB, Francisconi PA, Mondelli RF, et al. Conservative approach for a clinical resolution of enamel white spot lesions. Quintessence Int 2011;42:423-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Croll TP. Enamel Microabrasion. Chicago: Quintessence; 1991. p. 13-21.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Donly KJ, O'Neill M, Croll TP. Enamel microabrasion: A microscopic evaluation of the "abrosion effect". Quintessence Int 1992;23:175-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Torres-Rodríguez C, González-López S, Bolaños-Carmona V, Sánchez-Sánchez P, Rodríguez-Navarro A, Attin T. Demineralization effects of phosphoric acid on surface and subsurface bovine enamel bleached with in-office hydrogen peroxide. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:315-21.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ, Featherstone MJ. Dynamic factors affecting lesion initiation and progression in human dental enamel. II. Surface morphology of sound enamel and carieslike lesions of enamel. Quintessence Int 1988;19:773-85.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
de Melo RM, Travassos AC, Neisser MP. Shear bond strengths of a ceramic system to alternative metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:64-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Segura A, Donly KJ, Wefel JS. The effects of microabrasion on demineralization inhibition of enamel surfaces. Quintessence Int 1997;28:463-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Grazziotin GB, Rios D, Honório HM, Silva SM, Lima JE. In situ investigation of the remineralizing effect of saliva and fluoride on enamel following prophylaxis using sodium bicarbonate. Eur J Dent 2011;5:40-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Dalzell DP, Howes RI, Hubler PM. Microabrasion: Effect of time, number of applications, and pressure on enamel loss. Pediatr Dent 1995;17:207-11.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Calvo AF, Tabchoury CP, Del Bel Cury AA, Tenuta LM, da Silva WJ, Cury JA. Effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel application time on enamel demineralization of deciduous and permanent teeth. Caries Res 2012;46:31-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Paes Leme AF, Dalcico R, Tabchoury CP, Del Bel Cury AA, Rosalen PL, Cury JA. In situ effect of frequent sucrose exposure on enamel demineralization and on plaque composition after APF application and F dentifrice use. J Dent Res 2004;83:71-5.  Back to cited text no. 29
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Effect of resin infiltration and microabrasion on the microhardness, surface roughness and morphology of incipient carious lesions
Basak Yazkan,R. Banu Ermis
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2018; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2730    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded190    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal