Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 927  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 75-80  

Atomic force microscopic comparison of remineralization with casein-phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate paste, acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and iron supplement in primary and permanent teeth: An in-vitro study


1 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, People's College of Dental Science and Research Center, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Pedodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61471, Assir, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Modern Dental College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication13-Mar-2014

Correspondence Address:
Nikita Agrawal
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, People's Campus, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.128672

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Context: Demineralization of tooth by erosion is caused by frequent contact between the tooth surface and acids present in soft drinks. Aim: The present study objective was to evaluate the remineralization potential of casein-phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste, 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel and iron supplement on dental erosion by soft drinks in human primary and permanent enamel using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Materials and Methods: Specimens were made from extracted 15 primary and 15 permanent teeth which were randomly divided into three treatment groups: CPP-ACP paste, APF gel and iron supplement. AFM was used for baseline readings followed by demineralization and remineralization cycle. Results and Statistics: Almost all group of samples showed remineralization that is a reduction in surface roughness which was higher with CPP-ACP paste. Statistical analysis was performed using by one-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test with P < 0.05. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the application of CPP-ACP paste is effective on preventing dental erosion from soft drinks.

Keywords: Atomic force microscope, dental erosion, remineralization


How to cite this article:
Agrawal N, Shashikiran N D, Singla S, Ravi K S, Kulkarni VK. Atomic force microscopic comparison of remineralization with casein-phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate paste, acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and iron supplement in primary and permanent teeth: An in-vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5:75-80

How to cite this URL:
Agrawal N, Shashikiran N D, Singla S, Ravi K S, Kulkarni VK. Atomic force microscopic comparison of remineralization with casein-phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate paste, acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and iron supplement in primary and permanent teeth: An in-vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 14];5:75-80. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2014/5/1/75/128672


   Introduction Top


Dental erosion is a destructive process that renders the tooth surface hypomineralized, leading to an irreversible loss and its progressive softening thereby increases its susceptibility toward the mechanical forces. [1],[2] Epidemiological studies had shown the prevalence of dental erosion in children which varies widely, ranging from 2% to 57% respectively. [3],[4],[5]

The sucralose soft drinks report published annually suggests that consumption of soft drinks had increased consistently over past 15 years. [6] Such drinks causes a drop in plaque pH and on prolonged exposures leads to dental erosion. [7] According to Jaeggi and Lussi distribution of erosion in the primary dentition is on occlusal surface of molars predominantly and scarcely on the facial surface of maxillary incisors although in the permanent dentition it is seen on palatal surface of maxillary incisors. [8],[9] Besides that the susceptibility of teeth toward erosion also accounts on its mineral content, porosity and degree of enamel microcrystal arrangement as primary teeth been the susceptible one. [10] Eventually erosion is complete dissolution of hydroxy-apatite (HAP) that occurs layer by layer while carious lesion formation occur by partial dissolution of HAP. [11]

The substantial reduction in the intake of such beverages is imperative to restrain the process of erosion. [12] Certain bioactive agents for remineralization are also advocated including non-fluoridated agents like casein-phosphopeptide (CPP) with amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) which forms a protective layer and inhibits demineralization. [13],[14] Recently introduced iron supplement result in precipitation of ferric phosphate on the enamel, rendering it more resistant to erosion. [15],[16] Correspondingly the iron remineralizes eroded enamel by apatite nucleation and substitution of calcium in apatite as well. [17] Moreover most widely used are fluoridated agent like acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel which acts by deposition of calcium fluoride (CaF 2 ) predominantly on the enamel surface which successfully transformed into fluorapatite crystals. [18],[19]

Dental erosion has been widely investigated through a number of macro-microscopic techniques. The novel one is atomic force microscope having images in three dimensions, at atomic resolution with minimal sample preparation. [20] On the contrary scanning electron microscope (SEM) has the ability to image very rough samples due to its large depth of field and lateral field of view. [21] Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is widely recommended to study the bio-minerals and also applied to measure the early stages of enamel loss. [22] But contemporary the remineralization of erosion cavities is not widely investigated using AFM.

Thus, this paper aim to evaluate the remineralization potential of CPP-ACP paste, 1.23% APF gel and iron supplement on dental erosion produced by soft drinks in human primary and permanent enamel using AFM.


   Materials and Methods Top


A total of 30 teeth specimens were used in the study, of which 15 were primary teeth and the remaining 15 permanent teeth. After extraction, teeth were cleaned of soft-tissue debris by ultrasonic scaler, inspected for cracks, hypoplasia or any white spot lesion under light microscope 10X (iNEA Olympus Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi). Moreover disinfected in 5% sodium hypochlorite for 1 h and stored in de-ionized water (pH = 7.413). The specimens were sectioned transversely in the cervical area to separate crown from the root and sliced longitudinally for the labial portion using diamond disc (Dentorium, Germany) with a water spray. The labial segments of tooth specimens were placed in die stone mold measuring 10 mm × 8mm × 2mm in dimension and embedded in acrylic resin (Dentsply, New Delhi). The labial surface of each enamel specimen was grounded using silicon carbide papers (3M products) with consecutive grades of 600, 1000 and 1200 under water irrigation to remove 50-100 μm for producing a flat surface. [23]

The pH of soft drink was determined using digital pH meter (U-Tech, Singapore). The primary and permanent teeth specimen were randomly divided into three groups (with n = 5). Then specimens were subjected to a demineralization cycle by immersing in 6 ml of soft drink for 2 min stirred at constant speed of 120 rpms [24],[25] at room temperature at four consecutive intervals of 6 h imitating the meal time. The application of remineralizing agents were carried out at 0, 8, 24 and 36 h intervals [23] according to manufacturer's instruction and stored for further assessment. In between the experiment the specimen were stored in de-ionized water. The AFM observations were made after each phase i.e. baseline, demineralization and remineralization.

Group I: CPP-ACP paste-applied with applicator tip/brush for 3 min [23]

Group II: APF gel-applied with applicator tip/brush for 4 min [26]

Group III: Iron supplement-freshly prepared 6 ml 10 mM/L ferrous sulfate solution/specimen for 3 min. [27]

Atomic force microscope AutoProbe CP 100 (Themormicroscopes, Veeco, USA) used for the assessment of surface roughness specimens equipped with a piezoelectric scanner of 100 mm × 100 mm with a range of 7 mm in the z-direction. The root-mean-square roughness (R rms ) was obtained from the AFM investigations with a film area of 30 μm × 30 μm and resolution of 256 × 256 pixels. The labial surface of each sample was analyzed for at least 10 different sites. [23] Differences in the mean values among the groups were analyzed by one way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test with P < 0.05.


   Results Top


The pH of soft drink was 2.27 ± 0.04 at 25°C. The mean R rms of enamel surface at each phases of treatment were shown in [Table 1]. The R rms values of un-exposed (baseline) samples were in the range of 103.287 ± 5.4-129.406 ± 64.7 nm and 127.9 ± 61.4-170.776 ± 80.7 nm in primary and permanent teeth respectively. After demineralization, all groups showed an increase in R rms while on application of remineralizing agent a marked reduction in R rms was present in Group I (CPP-ACP paste) with 74.709 ± 19.01 and 125.17 ± 27.4 nm followed by Group II (APF gel) with 66.357 ± 25.1 and 116.259 ± 30.7 and Group III (Iron) with 146.589 ± 29.6 nm in permanent teeth while an increase in R rms was seen with 152.696 ± 98.5 nm in primary teeth. The change in Δ R rms i.e. Δ UNEXP-DEMIN, Δ UNEXP-REMIN, Δ REMIN-DEMIN was statistically not significant in CPP, APF and Iron Group (intra-group) for primary teeth and permanent (P > 0.05 ANOVA) as shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Mean surface roughness values (nm) and within group comparison using one way ANOVA


Click here to view


When the changes in R rms were compared between the groups (inter-group: CPP, APF and Iron Group), differences were statistically not significant for both primary and permanent teeth as shown in [Figure 1]. When primary and permanent teeth were compared, there were no significant differences in Δ R rms for different groups (P > 0.05 Mann-Whitney U-test).
Figure 1: Change in root mean square roughness after each phase (unexposed, demineralization and remineralization) within all the treatment groups of (a) promary and (b) permanent teeth

Click here to view


In all the groups, unexposed samples was quite smooth except for some scratches. All the demineralized samples showed "honey-comb" appearance which on remineralization undergoes surface deposition as shown in [Figure 2] and [Figure 3] of primary and permanent teeth respectively.
Figure 2: Primry tyeeth; (a,b,c) unexposed sample of group I, II,III; (d,e,f) demineralized sample of group I,II,III; (g,h,i) remineralized sample of group I,II,III respectively

Click here to view
Figure 3: Permanent teeth; (a,b,c) unexposed sample of group I, II,III; (d,e,f) demineralized sample of group I,II,III; (g,h,i)remineralized sample of group I,II,III respectively

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The aprisamtic outermost layer of enamel had a dense arrangement, less permeable because of its high mineral content and gradually wears off. [23],[28],[29] To standardize the specimens were grounded flat and polished, eliminating natural variations from enamel surface. [10],[23],[30] Further specimens were stored in de-ionized water which is in accordance to the technical report of the ISO (1991). [31] The complexity of the oral environment was not stimulate as the artificial saliva enhances the action of CPP-ACP paste by interacting with hydrogen ions and forms calcium hydrogen phosphate lead to enamel mineralization. [32] Remineralization cycle was carried out at an interval of 0, 8, 24 and 36 h so as to stimulate the application of any topically applied remineralizing agent. [23]

The baseline R rms of the present study was higher than the previous studies; with a range of 49-56 nm by Murakami et al. but was almost similar according to Quartarone et al. with a range of 50-120 nm. [20],[33] This variation in surface roughness accounts on anatomical topography of tooth varying with geographical location, age, oral environment present. Following demineralization no significant difference was present in mean surface roughness of primary and permanent teeth respectively. Previous study had similar mean surface roughness with a range of 140-290 nm after demineralization. [23] A marked reduction in surface roughness was present in Group I of primary teeth when compared with permanent teeth but was not statistically significant. The present result elucidated the post-eruptive enamel maturation advocating that the "older" tooth exposed to the oral environment for longer duration encounter acid and fluoride exposure rendering it more resistant. Also increased porosity and removal of aprismatic layer results primary enamel more reactive and enhance surface deposition. [28]

A considerable decrease in R rms was seen after remineralization with CPP-ACP paste (Group I) of both primary and permanent teeth but was not statistically significant which was in accordance to Poggio et al. and Quartarone et al. [20],[23] CCP-ACP paste results in formation of a layer that fills interprism cavities caused by erosion. [19] While due to its acidic nature APF gel further results in an increase in erosion cavities. Moreover, the presence of iron results in substitution of a phosphate group by carbonate thus confronts the negative influence of iron on enamel remineralization [34] which is confirmed by Alves et al. [17] Iron supplement showed increased in surface roughness instead which was explained by Weiss et al. as mature enamel had a greater affinity toward iron. [35]

Present in-vitro study was designed to assess remineralizing agent on eroded enamel surface using AFM which is not addressed in literature till now. AFM was used in the present study to verify protective effect of remineralizing agent on eroded enamel surface with images of high contrast and resolution. [23] According to Poggio et al., AFM analyzes topographical aspects of the tooth surface qualities like when enamel was treated with CPP-ACP paste, a collagen network with precipitated crystals was evident which was further confirmed by SEM. [36] Similarly Quartarone et al. showed that the CPP-ACP paste significantly reduces the erosion cavities depth. This was assessed by AFM data analysis through scaling concept and continuum stochastic equations which revealed the remineralizing mechanism of calcium phosphate paste. [20]

Thus, CPP-ACP paste showed a reduction in surface roughness than APF gel followed by iron supplement both in primary and permanent teeth but was not statistically significant. Moreover, CPP-ACP paste can be self-applied and expected to be effective intraorally as saliva will enhance the action of CPP-ACP according to the manufacturers. Hence been a very promising remineralizing material.


   Conclusions Top


The following conclusions were derived:

  1. All the samples showed an increase in surface roughness after demineralization and primary teeth shows greater demineralization but were not statistically significant
  2. Reduction in surface roughness after remineralization seen in all samples except iron supplement group of primary teeth
  3. Greater remineralization was present in samples of CPP-ACP paste than APF gel and iron supplement but was not statistically significant.


 
   References Top

1.Mahoney EK, Kilpatrick NM. Dental erosion: Part 1. Aetiology and prevalence of dental erosion. N Z Dent J 2003;99:33-41.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Kargul B, Bakkal M. Prevalence, etiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and preventive strategies of dental erosion: Literature review. Acta Stomatol Croat 2009;43:165-87.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Deshpande SD, Hugar SM. Dental erosion in children: An increasing clinical problem. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2004;22:118-27.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.El Aidi H, Bronkhorst EM, Truin GJ. A longitudinal study of tooth erosion in adolescents. J Dent Res 2008;87:731-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Linnett V, Seow WK. Dental erosion in children: A literature review. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:37-43.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.May J, Waterhouse PJ. Dental erosion and soft drinks: A qualitative assessment of knowledge, attitude and behaviour using focus groups of schoolchildren. A preliminary study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13:425-33.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Moazzez R, Smith BG, Bartlett DW. Oral pH and drinking habit during ingestion of a carbonated drink in a group of adolescents with dental erosion. J Dent 2000;28:395-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Erosion in early school-age children. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2004;114:876-81.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Jaeggi T, Schaffner M, Bürgin W, Lussi A. Erosions and wedge-shaped defects in Swiss Army recruits. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1999;109:1170-82.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Lippert F, Parker DM, Jandt KD. Susceptibility of deciduous and permanent enamel to dietary acid-induced erosion studied with atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:61-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Fejerskov O, Tencate JM, Larsen MJ, Pearce EI. Chemical interactions between the tooth and oral fluids. In: Fejerskov O, editor. Dental Caries. 2 nd ed., Ch. 4.  Blackwell Munksgaard, Garsington Road, Oxford,UK. 2003. p. 49-60.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Yip KH, Smales RJ, Kaidonis JA. The diagnosis and control of extrinsic acid erosion of tooth substance. Gen Dent 2003;51:350-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Wang X, Megert B, Hellwig E, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A. Preventing erosion with novel agents. J Dent 2011;39:163-70.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Piekarz C, Ranjitkar S, Hunt D, McIntyre J. An in vitro assessment of the role of tooth mousse in preventing wine erosion. Aust Dent J 2008;53:22-5.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Sales-Peres SH, Pessan JP, Buzalaf MA. Effect of an iron mouthrinse on enamel and dentine erosion subjected or not to abrasion: An in situ/ex vivo study. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:128-32.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Lussi A, Schaffner M, Bern TJ. Dental erosion - Diagnosis and prevention in children and adults. Int Dent J 2007;57:385-98.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Alves KM, Franco KS, Sassaki KT, Buzalaf MA, Delbem AC. Effect of iron on enamel demineralization and remineralization in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 2011;56:1192-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Olmez S, Yüksel B, Çelik H. Scanning electron microscope study of human enamel surfaces treated with topical fluoride agents. J Islamic Acad Sci 1993;6:133-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Jeng YR, Lin TT, Wong TY, Chang HJ, Shieh DB. Nano-mechanical properties of fluoride-treated enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 2008;87:381-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Quartarone E, Mustarelli P, Poggio C, Lombardini M. Surface kinetic roughening caused by dental erosion: An atomic force microscopy study. J Appl Phys 2008;103:104702-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Russell P, Batchelor D, Thornton J. SEM and AFM: Complementary Techniques for High Resolution Surface Investigations. Digital Instruments/Veeco Metrology. [Internet]. Santa Barbara, CA and Raleigh, NC:Veeco Instruments and North Carolina State University;2004 [cited 2011 Sep 24]. Available from: http://personal.cityu.edu.hk/~appkchu/AP5301/SEM%20and%20AFM%20-%20Complementary%20techniques.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Cheng ZJ, Wang XM, Cui FZ, Ge J, Yan JX. The enamel softening and loss during early erosion studied by AFM, SEM and nanoindentation. Biomed Mater 2009;4:015020.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Poggio C, Lombardini M, Dagna A, Chiesa M, Bianchi S. Protective effect on enamel demineralization of a CPP-ACP paste: An AFM in vitro study. J Dent 2009;37:949-54.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Amaechi BT, Higham SM, Edgar WM. Techniques for the production of dental eroded lesions in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:97-102.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Amaechi BT, Higham SM. In vitro remineralisation of eroded enamel lesions by saliva. J Dent 2001;29:371-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Hayacibara MF, Paes Leme AF, Lima YB, Gonçalves NC, Queiroz CS, Gomes MJ, et al. Alkali-soluble fluoride deposition on enamel after professional application of topical fluoride in vitro. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12:18-21.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Kato MT, de Moraes Italiani F, de Araújo JJ, Garcia MD, de Carvalho Sales-Peres SH, Buzalaf MA. Preventive effect of an iron varnish on bovine enamel erosion in vitro. J Dent 2009;37:233-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Badr SB, Ibrahim MA. Protective effect of three different fluoride pretreatments on artificially induced dental erosion in primary and permanent teeth. J Am Sci 2010;6:442-51.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Gwinnett AJ. The ultrastructure of the "prismless" enamel of permanent human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1967;12:381-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]    
30.Torres CP, Chinelatti MA, Gomes-Silva JM, Rizóli FA, Oliveira MA, Palma-Dibb RG, et al. Surface and subsurface erosion of primary enamel by acid beverages over time. Braz Dent J 2010;21:337-45.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1998;43:305-11.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Gedalia I, Dakuar A, Shapira L, Lewinstein I, Goultschin J, Rahamim E. Enamel softening with Coca-Cola and rehardening with milk or saliva. Am J Dent 1991;4:120-2.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Murakami C, Bönecker M, Corrêa MS, Mendes FM, Rodrigues CR. Effect of fluoride varnish and gel on dental erosion in primary and permanent teeth. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54:997-1001.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Tehrani MH, Ghafournia M, Samimi P, Savabi O, Parisay I, Askari N, et al. Effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate and acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on erosive enamel wear. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011;8:S64-70.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Weiss G, Stabholz A, Markitziu A, Meyer I, Brayer L, Gedalia I. The effect of iron on in vitro decalcification of human tooth enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:91-3.  Back to cited text no. 35
[PUBMED]    
36.Poggio C, Lombardini M, Vigorelli P, Ceci M. Analysis of dentin/enamel remineralization by a CPP-ACP paste: AFM and SEM study. Scanning 2013.  Back to cited text no. 36
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Protective effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on enamel erosion: Atomic force microscopy studies
Matteo Ceci,Maria Mirando,Riccardo Beltrami,Marco Chiesa,Claudio Poggio
Scanning. 2015; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Effect of self-assembling peptide P11-4 on enamel erosion: AFM and SEM studies
Matteo Ceci,Maria Mirando,Riccardo Beltrami,Marco Chiesa,Marco Colombo,Claudio Poggio
Scanning. 2015; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1936    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded310    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal