Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 1002  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 303-306  

Estimation of prostaglandin E 2 levels in gingival crevicular fluid in periodontal health, disease and after treatment


1 Department of Periodontics and Implantology, CKS Teja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupati, India
2 Department of Periodontics, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Kadapa, India
3 Department of Periodontics, St. Josephs Dental College, Eluru, India
4 Department of Periodontics, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication18-Sep-2013

Correspondence Address:
N Ravindra Reddy
Department of Periodontics and Implantology, CKS Teja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupati - 517 506, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.118354

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background and Objectives: Initial research has shown a positive correlation between the severity of periodontal disease (PD) and prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) concentrations in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). However, there are no enough reports to correlate the PGE 2 concentrations in GCF in periodontal health, disease and after treatment. Hence, the present study is aimed to estimate the levels of PGE 2 in GCF in periodontal health, disease and after periodontal therapy. Materials and Methods: A periodontal examination and collection of GCF by extracrevicular method was performed in 25 subjects selected randomly and categorized into three groups on the basis of plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth and clinical attachment level. Group I (healthy) consists of 10 subjects, Group II (chronic periodontitis) consists of 15 patients and Group III (after treatment group) consists of 15 patients of Group II. PGE 2 levels were estimated in GCF samples by using the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Results: All clinical parameters improved significantly after therapy (P < 0.001). PGE 2 was detected in all the samples. Highest mean PGE 2 concentrations in GCF were obtained for Group II while the lowest concentrations were seen in Group I and Group III. Statistically significant difference was found between the levels of PGE 2 at Group-II and Group-III (P < 0.05). Conclusion: There is a substantial increase in the concentrations of PGE 2 as PD progresses. Since PGE 2 levels in GCF are positively correlated with gingival index, plaque index, probing pocket depths and clinical attachment levels, PGE 2 may be considered as a "Novel Biomarker" in PD progression. However, controlled, longitudinal studies are needed to confirm this possibility.

Keywords: Gingival crevicular fluid, periodontal disease, prostaglandin E 2 , root planing, scaling


How to cite this article:
Kumar A K, Reddy N R, Babu M, Kumar P M, Reddy VS, Chavan C V. Estimation of prostaglandin E 2 levels in gingival crevicular fluid in periodontal health, disease and after treatment. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:303-6

How to cite this URL:
Kumar A K, Reddy N R, Babu M, Kumar P M, Reddy VS, Chavan C V. Estimation of prostaglandin E 2 levels in gingival crevicular fluid in periodontal health, disease and after treatment. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Sep 30];4:303-6. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2013/4/3/303/118354


   Introduction Top


Periodontal disease (PD) is an inflammatory process involving innate and adaptive immune responses characterized by irreversible loss of connective tissue attachment and supporting alveolar bone. These changes often lead to an esthetically and functionally compromised dentition. [1]

The inflammatory process occurring in PD is characterized by the infiltration of leukocytes, which limits bacterial invasion. There are a number of factors that promote leukocyte recruitment, including bacterial products, cytokines and cross-talk between innate and adaptive immune responses, chemokines, lipid mediators and complement. The immune system is a remarkably adaptive defense system that has evolved in vertebrates to protect them from invading pathogenic microorganisms. It is able to generate an enormous variety of cells and molecules capable of specifically recognizing and eliminating an apparently limitless variety of foreign invaders. These cells and molecules act together in an exquisitely adaptable dynamic network where complexity rivals that of the nervous system. [2]

Although PDs are initiated by bacteria that colonize the tooth surface and gingival sulcus, the host response is believed to play an essential role in the breakdown of connective tissue and alveolar bone, which are the key features of the disease process. An intermediate mechanism that lies between bacterial stimulation of host immune system and tissue destruction is the production of cytokines, which stimulates inflammatory events that activate effector mechanisms. These cytokines can be characterized as chemokines, innate immune cytokines and acquired immune cytokines. Although they were historically identified as leukocyte products, many are also produced by a number of cell types, including keratinocytes, resident mesenchymal cells (such as fibroblasts and osteoblasts) or their precursors, dendritic cells and endothelial cells. Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines that play an important role in leukocyte recruitment and may directly or indirectly modulate osteoclast formation. [3]

Prostaglandins, which are derived from arachidonic acid metabolism, are found in abundance at sites of inflammation. [4] These potent molecules are associated with tissue destruction, changes in fibroblast metabolism and bone resorption. [5] Recently, the levels of prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) have been reported to correlate positively with periodontal inflammation and impending tissue destruction. [6] In addition, PGE 2 levels have been noted to be elevated in the GCF from patients with juvenile Periodontitis compared to patients with adult periodontitis and gingivitis, it has diverse proinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. [7]

Theoretically, most of inflammation and periodontal destructive changes that occur in PD such as gingival redness, edema, collagen degradation and bone loss could be caused solely by the presence and direct actions of PGE 2 . It induces vasodilatation and increased capillary permeability, which elicit clinical signs of redness and edema. The vasoactive effects of PGE 2 are also enhanced by synergistic interactions with other inflammatory mediators such as bradykinin, cleavage fragments of the complement cascade and histamine. [7] PGE 2 can induce bone resorption and increases the number of osteoclasts, elevate Adenosine -3,5-monophosphate (cAMP) levels of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. [8] The osteoclastic bone resorption is regulated through the stimulation of osteoclasts by PGE 2 . [9] There is over whelming body of evidence, which correlates PGE 2 levels within the periodontal tissues and within the crevicular fluid to the clinical expression of PD. [5]

In the light of the above facts, PGE 2 has the potential to elicit or serve as an indicator of periodontal inflammation or destruction. To evaluate this potential, we have measured the PGE 2 levels in GCF by using the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).


   Materials and Methods Top


Patients for this study were selected from the outpatient section, Department of Periodontics, CKS Teja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupathi. Chronic periodontitis and healthy subjects between 20 and 55 years of age, based on the presence of probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level and radiographic evidence of bone loss were selected randomly and included into the study after obtaining verbal and written informed consent from all subjects. This study was reviewed and approved by the board of ethical committee of the Dental College. Patients who were diagnosed as suffering from chronic generalized periodontitis, free from any acute or chronic systemic diseases, who had not received any surgical or non-surgical periodontal therapy for the past 6 months were included and patients with the history of taking anti-inflammatory, antibiotics or immunosuppressive drugs in the last 6 months, with habit of smoking, female patients with pregnant or receiving oral contraceptives were excluded from the study.

Periodontal evaluation

Before GCF collection, radiographic examination and clinical periodontal assessments including gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were performed. Based on the results the subjects were divided into three groups: (1) Clinically healthy group (probing depth ≤3 mm, no redness and no bleeding upon probing, full mouth periapical radiographs with no bone resorption) (1 female and 9 males, ages 20-60 years, mean age 23.5 years). (2) Chronic periodontitis group (full mouth periapical radiographs with generalized bone resorption, chronic gingival inflammation, probing depth ≥5 mm) (3 females and 12 males, 20-60 years, mean age 32.8 years). (3) After treatment group (chronic periodontitis group that received non-surgical periodontal treatment and reviewed after 8 weeks).

GCF was collected only one site per participant was in all three groups. All the sites were selected based on criteria for healthy (Group I) and chronic periodontitis (Group II grouping). Scaling and root planning (SRP) was performed for chronic periodontitis patients at the same appointment after GCF collection. After 8 weeks, GCF was collected from the same site of these subjects and was considered as Group III. For this 8 week period subjects were called at 1-week interval and plaque control measures were performed. The GCF collected was immediately transferred to aliquots and stored at −70°C until time of the assay .

samples

After making the subjects sit comfortably in an upright position on the dental chair, the selected test site was air-dried and isolated with cotton rolls. Without touching the marginal gingiva, supragingival plaque was removed to avoid contamination and blocking of the microcapillary pipette. [10] GCF was collected by placing 1-3 ml calibrated volumetric microcapillary pipettes obtained from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Company, USA (Catalog No.p0549). By placing the tip of the pipette extracrevicularly (unstimulated) for 5-20 min, a standardized volume of 3 ml GCF was collected using the calibration on the micropipette from each test site . The test sites, which did not express standard volume (3 ml) of GCF and micropipette contaminated with blood and saliva, were excluded.

Principle of the assay

This assay is based on the competitive binding technique, in which PGE 2 present in a sample competes with a fixed amount of horseradish peroxidase-labeled PGE 2 for sites on a mouse monoclonal antibody. During the incubation, the mouse monoclonal antibody becomes bound to the goat anti-mouse antibody coated onto the microplate. Following a wash to remove excess conjugate and unbound sample, a substrate solution is added to the wells to determine the bound enzyme activity. The color development is stopped and the absorbance is read at 450 nm. The intensity of the color is inversely proportional to the concentration of PGE 2 in the sample. ELISA kits were obtained from R and D systems Co. (USA).

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were performed using the statistical package SPSS (SPSS Inc., Microsoft Corp., Chicago, USA). The difference in PGE 2 levels were sought using the Mann-Whitney U test. The correlation among the levels of PGE 2 and clinical parameters was assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation test. The statistical significances of PGE 2 concentrations before and after treatment were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Kruskal Wallis test were performed to significant differences between study groups.


   Results Top


The GCF concentrations of PGE 2 are shown in [Table 1]. Significant differences (P < 0.001) in the concentrations of PGE 2 were found between the two groups tested by Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations among the levels of PGE 2 and the clinical parameters are shown in [Table 2]. The PGE 2 concentrations (pg/ml) were positively correlated with all four clinical parameters that are with GI, Plaque Index (PI), PD, CAL.
Table 1: Mean PGE2 concentration of Group I, Group II and Group III

Click here to view
Table 2: Results of spearman correlation test between GCF PGE2 and clinical parameters in chronic periodontitis (Group II)

Click here to view


To determine whether the PGE 2 concentrations of the chronic periodontitis changed as a consequence of treatment, we examined PGE 2 concentrations before and after non-surgical periodontal therapy. However after treatment showed significantly lower PGE 2 concentrations (P < 0.01) [Table 3].
Table 3: Comparison of PGE2 GCF concentrations and clinical parameters healthy, chronic periodontitis and after periodontal treatment

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Theoretically, most of the inflammatory and periodontal destructive changes that occur in PDs such as gingival redness, edema, collagen degradation and bone loss could be caused solely by the presence and direct actions of PGE 2 . PGE 2 induces vasodilation and increases capillary permeability, which elicit clinical signs of redness, edema, bone resorption and inhibition of collagen synthesis. [6]

Therefore, in the present study, the levels of PGE 2 in GCF in periodontal health, disease and after treatment were estimated and the objective is to evaluate the effect of phase I periodontal treatment on GCF levels of PGE 2 . In the present study, GCF collection was carried out using the microcapillary pipettes and PGE 2 concentrations analyzed by ELISA. GCF was collected using the microcapillary pipettes to avoid non-specific attachment of the analyte to filter paper fibers, which would have falsely reduced levels of detectable cytokines, leading to underestimation of the correlation between Tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases -1 (TIMP-1) levels and disease severity/progression. [10]

In healthy gingival tissue, GCF always contains some inflammatory cells that increase with severity of the inflammation. Among these cells, mononuclear leukocytes/macrophages are the chief source for PGE 2 . Any stimulus, which per tube or damage cell membrane will trigger the "arachidonic acid" leading to the production of prostaglandins. In the present study, the mean concentrations of PGE 2 in GCF were found to increase progressively from healthy (i.e., 56.28 pg/ml) to periodontitis group (i.e., 326.62 pg/ml) with P < 0.001. These results are in accordance with Tsai et al., [11] Nakashima et al., [12] Leibur et al., [13] Offenbacher et al., [14] Needleman et al., [15] and Preshaw et al. [16] According to Tsai et al., [11] the mean PGE 2 concentrations were found to increase progressively from healthy to diseased gingival tissues.

The chronic periodontitis group after 2 months of non-surgical periodontal treatment had a significant reduction of PGE 2 and significant improvement of in all clinical parameters. In the present study, chronic periodontitis subjects were treated by non-surgical periodontal therapy-SRP and strict oral hygiene measures were instituted. The mean PGE 2 concentrations in GCF in chronic periodontitis group reduced from 326.62 pg/ml to an after treatment levels of 107.643 pg/ml, which were statistically significant with P < 0.001. The results are in accordance with Tsai et al., [11] Preshaw et al., [16] Offenbacher et al., [14] Alexander et al. [17]

Tsai et al., [11] evaluated the effect of SRP on GCF levels of PGE 2 in a group of patients with advanced PD. As per the results of Tsai et al., [11] the mean GCF PGE 2 concentrations were found to be more in periodontitis group (i.e., 470.91 ng/ml) compared with the post-treatment group (i.e., 377.32 ng/ml) with P < 0.01.

The total correlation of PGE 2 has strong positive correlation with all four periodontal parameter and was concomitantly increased with scores of gingival index, plaque index, probing depth clinical attachment loss. The results of Group II in the present study showed a significant positive correlation found between levels of GCF PGE 2 concentrations and clinical parameters with "r" value of 0.816 for GI, 0.661 for probing pocket depths, 0.826 for CAL, 0.704 for PI in Group II. These results are in accordance with Tsai et al., [11] and Nakashima et al. [12] Based on biological activities of PGE 2 , we suggest that PGE 2 associated with and are responsible for at least in part, inflammatory changes in the affected tissues. The results of this study suggesting that PGE 2 levels increased with periodontal inflammation and destruction. The GCF levels of PGE 2 have stronger relation with clinical parameters and pathogenesis of PD.

In light of our results, we suggest that level of GCF PGE 2 will be useful in assessing the health and disease status of periodontal tissues. It can be used as a marker of gingival inflammation in order to determine the effect of periodontal therapy. The measurement of PGE 2 levels in crevicular fluid has been shown to an indication of periodontal tissue destruction and collection of GCF is a non-invasive nature and hence developing PGE 2 chair side diagnostic kit to measure the PGE 2 levels not only estimate the nature of PD before treatment, but also after treatment. Then even though, measurement of clinical parameters may dictate further management, which is in practice today, our study may pay way for developing new diagnostic kit, which may be specific and user to you.

In conclusion, our data indicate that PGE 2 in GCF shows dynamic changes according to the severity of PD and the concentrations of PGE 2 have a strong correlation with gingival inflammation and clinical parameters. Measurement PGE 2 in GCF by ELISA may be an effective method for assessing periodontal inflammation.

 
   References Top

1.Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carrenza FA. Clinical Periodontology, 10 th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Publishers; 2007. p. 222-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Preshaw PM. Host response modulation in periodontics. Periodontol 2000 2008;48:92-110.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Ammons WF, Schectman LR, Page RC. Host tissue response in chronic periodontal disease. 1. The normal periodontium and clinical manifestations of dental and periodontal disease in the marmoset. J Periodontal Res 1972;7:131-43.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Kuehl FA Jr, Egan RW. Prostaglandins, arachidonic acid, and inflammation. Science 1980;210:978-84.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Offenbacher S, Heasman PA, Collins JG. Modulation of host PGE2 secretion as a determinant of periodontal disease expression. J Periodontol 1993;64:432-44.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Nakashima K, Roehrich N, Cimasoni G. Osteocalcin, prostaglandin E2 and alkaline phosphatase in gingival crevicular fluid: Their relations to periodontal status. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:327-33.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Salvi GE, Lang NP. Host response modulation in the management of periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32 Suppl 6:108-29.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Dziak R. Biochemical and molecular mediators of bone metabolism. J Periodontol 1993;64:407-15.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Chambers TJ, Dunn CJ. Pharmacological control of osteoclastic motility. Calcif Tissue Int 1983;35:566-70.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Griffiths GS. Formation, collection and significance of gingival crevice fluid. Periodontol 2000 2003;31:32-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Tsai CC, Hong YC, Chen CC, Wu YM. Measurement of prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 in the gingival crevicular fluid. J Dent 1998;26:97-103.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Nakashima K, Giannopoulou C, Andersen E, Roehrich N, Brochut P, Dubrez B, et al. A longitudinal study of various crevicular fluid components as markers of periodontal disease activity. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:832-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Leibur E, Tuhkanen A, Pintson U, Söder PO. Prostaglandin E2 levels in blood plasma and in crevicular fluid of advanced periodontitis patients before and after surgical therapy. Oral Dis 1999;5:223-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Offenbacher S, Odle BM, Van Dyke TE. The use of crevicular fluid prostaglandin E2 levels as a predictor of periodontal attachment loss. J Periodontal Res 1986;21:101-12.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Needleman IG, Moles DR, Collins AM. Periodontal flap surgery with 25% metronidazole gel. (2) Effect on gingival crevicular fluid PGE2. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:193-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Preshaw PM, Lauffart B, Zak E, Jeffcoat MK, Barton I, Heasman PA. Progression and treatment of chronic adult periodontitis. J Periodontol 1999;70:1209-20.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Alexander DC, Martin JC, King PJ, Powell JR, Caves J, Cohen ME. Interleukin-1 beta, prostaglandin E2, and immunoglobulin G subclasses in gingival crevicular fluid in patients undergoing periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1996;67:755-62.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 A systematic review of biomarkers of gingival crevicular fluid: Their predictive role in diagnosis of periodontal disease status
Stuti Gupta,Shivjot Chhina,Sachit Anand Arora
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Epithelial Cells Secrete Interferon-? Which Suppresses Expression of Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand in Human Mandibular Osteoblast-Like Cells
Pakchisa Khonsuphap,Prasit Pavasant,Rizky Aditya Irwandi,Chidchanok Leethanakul,Anjalee Vacharaksa
Journal of Periodontology. 2017; 88(3): e65
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Identification of Gingival Crevicular Fluid Sampling, Analytical Methods, and Oral Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review
Zeyad Nazar Majeed,Koshy Philip,A. M. Alabsi,Saravanan Pushparajan,Dasan Swaminathan
Disease Markers. 2016; 2016: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Regulation of inflammation by lipid mediators in oral diseases
S Sommakia,OJ Baker
Oral Diseases. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Effects of Ozone Therapy on the Early Healing Period of Deepithelialized Gingival Grafts: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
Zekeriya Tasdemir,Banu Arzu Alkan,Haydar Albayrak
Journal of Periodontology. 2016; 87(6): 663
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Expansion of the peri-implant attached gingiva with a three-dimensional collagen matrix in head and neck cancer patientsóresults from a prospective clinical and histological study
Jonas Lorenz,Maximilian Blume,Mike Barbeck,Anna Teiler,C. James Kirkpatrick,Robert A. Sader,Shahram Ghanaati
Clinical Oral Investigations. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Lidocaine subgingival irrigation modulate the levels of prostaglandin E2 in gingival crevicular fluid after periodontal therapy
Alessandra da Cruz Galhardo Camargo Gabriela,Eduardo Marra Fellows J otilde ao,Andr eacute a Venturini Pola Poiate Isis,de Aguiar Ribeiro Apoena,Castro Dip Etyene,Linhares Coutinho Silva Natalia,Lu iacute sa Palhares de Miranda Ana,Luiz Mendon ccedil a Tributino Jorge
Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene. 2015; 7(11): 190
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2115    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded233    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal