Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 3836  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 81-83  

A modified surgical approach to a case of mandibular fracture in a 5-year-old girl


1 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, India

Date of Web Publication9-May-2013

Correspondence Address:
Attiguppe R Prabhakar
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere 577 004
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.111601

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Injuries to the face are far more uncommon than other injuries in children. However, when they occur they can pose considerable management challenges to concerned specialists and the subsequent functional and esthetic impact to the growing child can be overwhelming. Here is a report of a 5-year-old girl diagnosed with fracture of the body of the mandible and an associated fracture of the parasymphysis. This paper presents a unique treatment modality considering the various anatomic and developmental factors in such young children.

Keywords: Mandibular fracture, trauma, transosseous wiring


How to cite this article:
Prabhakar AR, Rai KK, Prahlad D. A modified surgical approach to a case of mandibular fracture in a 5-year-old girl. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:81-3

How to cite this URL:
Prabhakar AR, Rai KK, Prahlad D. A modified surgical approach to a case of mandibular fracture in a 5-year-old girl. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Feb 29];4:81-3. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2013/4/1/81/111601


   Introduction Top


It is quite a common experience for pedodontists to encounter traumatic injuries in children ranging from minor contusion injuries to the teeth to fractures of the jaw bones. Children have an immense capacity for healing in the shortest possible time with a minimum of complications. The assistance that growth can give, coupled with the inherent ability of the young bone, periosteum, and soft-tissues to adapt to new situations, is quite different from that which is seen in adults. [1] In children, the incidence and etiology of craniomaxillofacial trauma are affected by age-related activities. Overall, facial fractures in the pediatric population comprise less than 15% of all facial fractures and are rare below age 5 (0.6-1.4%). [2]


   Case Report Top


Here is a case of a 5-year-old girl who reported to us 2 days after encountering trauma due to fall from an elevated platform. Clinical examination revealed a discontinuity of the lower border of the mandible on the left side. Her mouth opening was restricted to 10 mm and the mandible was seen to deviate to the left side on opening. Intra oral examination revealed a derangement of occlusion. There was no mobility of the fractured segments. A hematoma was present on the buccal aspect in the parasymphyseal region on the right side [Figure 1]. Further, the orthopantomograph confirmed our clinical observations [Figure 2]. A diagnosis of fracture of the body of the mandible on the left side associated with a fracture of the parasymphysis on the right side of the mandible was made.

The treatment approach chosen was a unique one, involving a modification of the conventional transosseous wiring technique. The procedure was carried out under general anesthesia. The body fracture was exposed using a buccal vestibular incision. Two holes were drilled on either side of the fracture line into the buccal cortical plate; one at the region of external oblique ridge to avoid damage to the permanent tooth germ of the first molar and the other close to the lower border of the mandible. Two intermaxillary fixation (IMF) screws with eyelets, 1.5 mm diameter and 10 mm in length were inserted into the holes such that they were perpendicular to the cortical plate following which a 26 gauge stainless steel wire was passed into the eyelets and fastened. Having assuring reduction and fixation of the fractured ends, wound closure was achieved. Fracture reduction and stabilization was concluded satisfactory as shown by the post-operative occlusion. Recovery from general anesthesia was uneventful. An orthopantomograph was made post-operatively to confirm the approximation of the fractured ends [Figure 3]a. The patient was discharged on the third post-operative day with instructions for a soft diet and maintenance of good oral hygiene.
Figure 1: Pre-operative intra oral view

Click here to view
Figure 2: Pre-operative orthopantomogram showing discontinuity in the lower border of the mandibular body on the left and in the parasymphysis on the right

Click here to view
Figure 3: (a) Immediate post-operative orthopantomogram showing the approximation of the fractured ends. (b) Following removal of the screws after 4 weeks of placement

Click here to view


Subsequently, satisfactory healing was observed. Four weeks after placement of the screws, following the confirmation of the stability of the fractured ends both clinically and radiographically a decision was made to remove the screws [Figure 3]b. The patient was followed periodically, and presently shows satisfactory occlusion [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Intra-oral view 1 month after removal of screws

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


There are certain unique features which distinguish a pediatric patient from an adult. Treatment of jaw bone fractures in the pediatric age group almost always requires alterations due to anatomical reasons. At birth, the ratio between cranial and facial volume is approximately 8:1. The retruded position of the face relative to the "protecting" skull is an important reason for the lower incidence of mid-face and mandibular fractures in young children (less than 5 years of age). The fractures are often minimally displaced because of the thick layer of adipose tissue that covers the more elastic bones and the suture lines are flexible. In addition, stability is increased by the presence of tooth buds within the jaws and the lack of sinus pneumatization. [2] As in adults, clinical signs of mandibular fractures may include displacement of the fragments, mobility, crepitus, hematoma, swelling, mucosal tears, limited mouth opening, malocclusion, pain, and sensory deficits in the distribution of the inferior alveolar nerve. In children, clinical suspicion of a fractured mandible is confirmed by panoramic, may be supplemented by posterior-anterior, lateral oblique and occlusal radiographic views. [3]

Treatment is aimed at obtaining bony union, normalizing the occlusion, restoring normal form and function, and avoiding impediments to normal growth. To best fulfill these aims the bony fragments must be accurately aligned. Efforts to ensure this alignment have led to complex methods of treatment. [1]

Treatment of mandibular fractures in children depends on the fracture site and the stage of skeletal and dental development. [3] Fractures of the mandible limited to the alveolar process are treated by open or closed reduction and immobilization by splints and arch bars for 2-3 weeks. [4] However, displaced mandibular fractures need to be reduced and immobilized. Open reduction and internal fixation provides stable three-dimensional reconstruction, promotes primary bone healing, shortens treatment time and eliminates the need for or permits early release of maxillo mandibular fixation (MMF). Decreased dependence on MMF improves post-operative respiratory care, nutritional intake and oral hygiene measures. [5] At times, tooth buds within the mandible may not allow internal fixation with plates and screws and hence modification of the existing procedures should be resorted to. This case presents one such alternative approach in a 5-year-old-girl in whom a modification of the conventional transosseous wiring technique was adopted. The transosseous wiring technique involves drilling of holes on either side of the fracture line and the stainless steel wire is passed into the holes and tightened to bring about Coaptation of the fragments. [6] In our case, however, the presence of tooth buds in the vicinity of the fracture line exempted us from drilling holes through and through into the bone. Thus, the screws were placed in the buccal cortical plate, one close to the inferior border of the mandible to prevent damage to developing premolar and to the nerve terminals exiting the mental foramen and the other was placed in the region of the external oblique ridge carefully to avoid damage to the developing first molar.

The parasymphyseal fracture was left untreated due to potential harm to the developing canine and also since it did not markedly alter the occlusion. Additionally, the treatment of parasymphyseal fractures is recommended only when the buds of the canines have moved up from their inferior position at the mandibular border after age 9. [2]


   Conclusion Top


The ultimate result with our treatment approach was the accurate approximation of the fractured segments, restoration of occlusion, no damage to the developing teeth intra-operatively and lastly patient satisfaction.

 
   References Top

1.Myall RW. Management of mandibular fractures in children. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2009;21:197-201. vi.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Zimmermann CE, Troulis MJ, Kaban LB. Pediatric facial fractures: Recent advances in prevention, diagnosis and management. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:823-33.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Kaban LB. Diagnosis and treatment of fractures of the facial bones in children 1943-1993. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:722-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Tanaka N, Uchide N, Suzuki K, Tashiro T, Tomitsuka K, Kimijima Y, et al. Maxillofacial fractures in children. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1993;21:289-93.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Posnick JC, Wells M, Pron GE. Pediatric facial fractures: Evolving patterns of treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:836-44.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Thoma KH, Vanderveen JL. Oral surgery. 5 th ed, Vol. 1. Saint Louis: MC Mosby; 1969. p. 551.  Back to cited text no. 6
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1618    
    Printed46    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded158    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal