Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 1707  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 138-141  

Prosthodontic rehabilitation of dentinogenesis imperfecta


1 Department of Prosthodontics, Aditya Dental College and Hospital, Beed, Maharashtra, India
2 VSPMDCRC, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication20-Jul-2011

Correspondence Address:
Anil Goud
Department of Prosthodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.83072

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Dentinogenesis imperfecta and its prosthodontic management is a challenging task. Treatment protocol varies according to clinical case. Although various reports in the literature suggest general guidelines for treatment planning, the present case report describes a full mouth rehabilitation of a young patient with dentinogenesis imperfecta treated by maxillary fixed partial dentures and mandibular fiber reinforced overdenture with metal occlusal surfaces.

Keywords: Dentinogenesis imperfect, overdenture, pre-peg


How to cite this article:
Goud A, Deshpande S. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of dentinogenesis imperfecta. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2:138-41

How to cite this URL:
Goud A, Deshpande S. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of dentinogenesis imperfecta. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Mar 30];2:138-41. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2011/2/2/138/83072


   Introduction Top


Dentinogenesis imperfecta is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait and in fact it is the one of the most common dominantly inherited disorder in humans. The scalloping at the dentino-enamel junction which is thought to help the mechanical interlocking, the two hard tissues together are defective in these conditions which leads to enamel fracture easily from the defective dentin. The exposed dentin may then undergo severe and rapid attrition. Early diagnosis and proper treatment is mandatory in these conditions. Delay in the treatment can cause partial or complete loss of clinical crowns with healthy roots. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6]


   Case Report Top


A 35-year-old male patient came to our department with a chief complaint of occasional chipping of teeth while eating and dislodged fixed partial denture. Patient had experienced abnormal dentition since childhood [Figure 1]. He had undergone extraction of some primary teeth due to caries. The color of primary dentition was yellowish. He had experienced continuous chipping of tooth structure while masticating especially lower dentition. Six-year back his lower left molars were extracted due to fracture and attrition. He had gone for extraction of 16, 27, 46 and 47 last year and nickel-chrome fixed partial denture was fabricated on 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 33, 34, 35, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48.
Figure 1: Pretreatment intraoral views

Click here to view


These fixed partial dentures frequently come out during eating. The patient was keeping cotton below these fixed partial dentures for retention while eating. He keeps them out of mouth for the rest of the time. No history of any major illness or hospitalization was there. His grandfather has got opalescent brown, worn-out dentition.

Radiographic examination

OPG full mouth and IOPA X-rays revealed total obliteration of pulp chambers with 33,34,35,43,44,45,48. Partial obliteration of pulp chambers with rest of the teeth with abnormal pulpal morphology. No evidence of any periapical pathology with any tooth was revealed. Posterior to anterior (PA) chest and PA skull were normal [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Orthopantomographs

Click here to view


Pathological investigations

Maxillary badly destructed second molar was sent to lab for histological examination. It was revealed that there was normal enamel rods, irregular calcified dentinal tubules, and almost completely obliterated pulp chamber.

Diagnosis

After correlating clinical pathological and radiographic findings, diagnosis of dentinogenesis imperfecta (Type-II) was made and osteogenesis imperfecta was ruled out from the differential diagnosis.

Treatment plan

treatment plan for this patient should be placement of endosseous implants for missing teeth followed by full mouth rehabilitation. [7] Due to economical factors under the circumstances, full crowns and fixed partial dentures were planned for maxillary teeth. Ideally, single complete denture is not indicated in mandible. [8] As the denture base coverage area is very less so there are chances of midline fracture in mandibular single complete dentures due to flexural fatigue and impact force. [9] To avoid this complication in this case denture base was reinforced the with glass fibers which is supposed to be one of the best choice for denture reinforcement. [10]

Treatment procedure

Diagnostic impressions were made and diagnostic wax-up was done [Figure 3]. 17 was extracted and send to the oral pathology lab for investigations. Amalgam restorations were done with 18, 48. Scaling and polishing was done. Crown lengthening was carried out with 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. 33, 34, 35, 43, 44, 45 were prepared to receive nickel-chrome overdenture copings [Figure 4] and overdenture copings were cemented on 33, 34, 35, 43, 44, 45 [Figure 5]. Special tray was fabricated for lower overdenture. Border molding was carried out with low fusing impression compound (DPI Pinnacle Tracing Sticks, DPI, India). Wash impression was made in medium body PVS impression material (Aquasil, Dentsply Caulk, USA). Final cast was prepared, blocked out, and duplicated. On the working cast, temporary denture base was fabricated. Wax rim was prepared and height was adjusted posteriorly up to a level 2/3 of retromolar pad and anteriorly up to the level of lower lip. The vertical dimension was recorded according to esthetics and phonetics. Centric relation was recorded in bite registration wax (Alminax, UK) [Figure 5]. Teeth arrangement was done according to anatomical landmarks, phonetics, and esthetics.
Figure 3: Centric record

Click here to view
Figure 4: Teeth preparation for metal copings

Click here to view
Figure 5: Cementation of metal copings

Click here to view


Preparation of metal occlusal surfaces

Lower overdenture was flasked and dewaxed. After dewaxing, posterior teeth were removed from their indentations and they sectioned horizontally from occlusal one third. Wax loops were placed at the back of sectioned teeth for anchorage. These sectioned occlusal surfaces with loops were casted in nickel-chrome. These metal occlusal surfaces with the help of loops were kept into their remaining part of respective indentations and luted [Figure 6] and [Figure 7].
Figure 6: Sectioning of acrylic occlusal surfaces and addition of retentive loops

Click here to view
Figure 7: Pre-peg embedded in resin dough

Click here to view


Reinforcementof the denture base

Glass fibers were impregnated with silane (Heliobond, Ivoclar) and pre-peg was prepared. This pre-peg was then sandwiched in dough of heat cure acrylic and packed (compression molding technique). Curing was done. Finished lower overdenture was evaluated intraorally [Figure 8] and [Figure 9].
Figure 8: Processed denture intraoral view

Click here to view
Figure 9: Maxillary core buildups and teeth preparations

Click here to view


Fabrication of maxillary restorations

Worn out tooth structure was build with core buildup composite [Figure 10] (Lumiglass, Dentsply Caulk, USA) reinforced with titanium pins (Amalgam pins, DPI, India) for each cusp. Upper teeth were prepared according to the occlusal surface of lower overdenture teeth. Provisionals were fabricated and delivered along with lower over denture. The increased vertical dimension was evaluated up to 4 weeks. After the final adjustment of the provisionals, interocclusal records were made and articulator (Hanau H2, USA) was programmed accordingly. Final preparation of the upper teeth was done. Gingival retraction was done with retraction cord (Ultrapack, Dentsply, USA) impregnated with haemostatic agent (AlCl 3 MP Sai, India). To prevent relapse of marginal gingiva before loading of impression material and to have uniform space for impression material, impression was made with the matrix impression technique using bite registration material (Exa Bite, GC, Japan) and Light body PVS and Putty PVS (Aquasil Dentsply Caulk, USA ) [Figure 11]. After the final setting the tray was removed in toto and poured in type IV die stone (Kalrock, Kalabhai, India). Thus master cast fabricated and transferred to the articulator according to the lower denture [Figure 10], [Figure 11] and [Figure 12].
Figure 10: Matrix impression

Click here to view
Figure 11: Mounting of die cast as opposed to mandibular denture and fi nal restorations

Click here to view
Figure 12: Post-treatment intraoral view

Click here to view


Centric relation was recorded along with final overdenture and relation transferred to the articulator [Figure 12]. Upper nickel-chrome FPDS and full crowns with acrylic facing were fabricated. Upper FPD's full crowns were luted with temporary non-euzenol cement (Temposil, Coltene Whaledent, Switzerland) and lower overdenture delivered. Patient was recalled after 15 days for final luting. Final cementation (GC 1, Gold label, Japan) was done.


   Conclusion Top


One of the greatest challenges for the prosthodontist is to provide adequate treatment to achieve functional and esthetic restoration in cases of diseases like dentinogenesis imperfecta. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for obtaining a favorable prognosis. Preservation of the existing tissues and rehabilitation of the function and esthetics with a multidisciplinary approach is of paramount importance. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of this kind greatly improves function, esthetics and proves to be great psychological boost to the patient's well-being.

 
   References Top

1.Bouvier D, Duprez JP, Morrier JJ, Bois D. Strategies for rehabilitation in the treatment of dentinogenesis imperfecta in a child: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:238-41.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Takagi Y, Koshiba H, Kimura O, Kuboki Y, Sasaki S. Sasaki.Dentinogenesis imperfecta: Evidence of qualitative alteration in the organic dentin matrix. J Oral Pathol 1980:9:201-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Pettiette MT, Wright JT, Trope M. Dentinogenesis imperfecta: Endodontic implications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:733-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Sutherland EP, Smith CJ. The teeth in Osteogenesis and Dentinogenesis imperfecta. Br Dent J 1980;149:287-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Witkop CJ Jr. Hereditary defects of dentin. Dent Clin North Am 1975;19:25-45.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Sheilds ED, Bixler D, EL-Kafrawy AM. A proposed classification for heritable human dentine defects with a description of a new entity. Archs Oral Biol 1973:18:543-53.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Henke DA, Fridrich TA, Aquilino SA. Occlusal rehabilitation of a patient with dentinogenesis imperfecta: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:503-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Witkop CJ Jr. Amelogenesis imprefecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia revisited: Problems in classification. J Oral Patho 1989;17:547-53.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Mars M, Farrant S, Roberts GJ. Dentinogenesis imperfecta -Report of a 5-generation family. Br Dent J 1976;140:206-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Mars M, Smith BG. Dentinogenesis imperfecta, An intergrated conservative approach to treatment. Br Dent J 1982;152:15-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12]


This article has been cited by
1 Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II: A case report
P Moini,M Afsharianzadeh,E Abdoli Tafti
Iranian Journal of Pediatric Dentistry. 2014; 9(2): 73
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Full-Mouth Rehabilitation for a Patient With Dentinogenesis Imperfecta: A Clinical Report
Sompop Bencharit,Michael B. Border,C. Russell Mack,Warren C. Byrd,John T. Wright
Journal of Oral Implantology. 2014; 40(5): 593
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Notch Activation by the Metalloproteinase ADAM17 Regulates Myeloproliferation and Atopic Barrier Immunity by Suppressing Epithelial Cytokine Synthesis
Aditya Murthy,Yang Washington Shao,Swami R. Narala,Sam D. Molyneux,Juan Carlos Zúñiga-Pflücker,Rama Khokha
Immunity. 2012; 36(1): 105
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4416    
    Printed116    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded571    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal