Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 597  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 277-280  

Familial Crouzon syndrome


1 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur 522509, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Pedodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur 522509, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication1-Feb-2011

Correspondence Address:
Y Samatha
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur 522509, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.76402

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Crouzon syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition of the craniosynostotic syndromes without syndactyly and with various dentofacial anomalies. Craniosynostosis, maxillary hypoplasia, shallow orbits, ocular proptosis and hypertelorism are the characteristic features of Crouzon syndrome. This report describes the variable clinical features in affected individuals over two generations of a family with dentofacial deformities and review of literature.

Keywords: Craniosynostosis, Crouzon syndrome, dentofacial anomalies


How to cite this article:
Samatha Y, Vardhan T H, Kiran A R, Sai Sankar A J, Ramakrishna B. Familial Crouzon syndrome. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1:277-80

How to cite this URL:
Samatha Y, Vardhan T H, Kiran A R, Sai Sankar A J, Ramakrishna B. Familial Crouzon syndrome. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 15];1:277-80. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2010/1/4/277/76402


   Introduction Top


In 1912, Crouzon first described this syndrome as one of the varieties of craniofacial dysostosis caused by premature obliteration and ossification of two or more sutures, most often coronal and sagittal [1] and suggested the term "dysostose craniofaciale hereditare". [2] It is also referred to as craniofacial dysostosis, hereditary craniofacial dysostosis, dysostosis craniofacialis [2] , syndromic craniosynostosis and premature craniosynostosis. [3]

Its incidence is estimated at 1 in 25,000 births. [4],[5] Of these cases, 67% are familial, [6] whereas 33-56% may arise as a consequence of spontaneous mutations. [5] In a study conducted by Kriberg, new mutations due to increased parental age played a significant role in the etiology of this syndrome. [6]

The condition is thought to arise due to mutation in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) and FGFR3 genes on chromosome 10 [1],[5],[6] in both sporadic and inherited cases.[1],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] The severity of expression of the disease increases in successive siblings, with the youngest child being the most severely affected. [7]

Features of this syndrome include craniosynostosis, maxillary hypoplasia, shallow orbits, ocular proptosis and hypertelorism. There is considerable variation in the extent of these features, but ocular proptosis is always present even in the absence of craniosynostosis which is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome.[4],[5] Other features associated with this condition are hearing loss, [2],[4],[6] deviation of nasal septum, [6] calcification of stylohyoid ligament, [6] cervical spine anomalies [2],[4],[6] and stenosis of jugular foramen. [4],[6]

Franceschetti coined the term "pseudo Crouzon syndrome" to designate those cases which simulate the Crouzon syndrome, and in which patients do not have relative mandibular prognathism, parrot nose and there is no familial occurrence. [2]


   Case Report Top


A 13-year-old male patient reported to the outpatient department with a chief complaint of irregular arrangement of his teeth. The boy had large eyes at the time of birth and they became more prominent as he grew [[Figure 1]a]. His parents had noticed the discrepancy in the size of the jaws at the age of 6 months and the lower jaw was forwardly placed when compared to the upper jaw [[Figure 1]b]. His medical history was not contributory. Family history revealed 2 nd degree consanguity, with the same problem in his mother.

On extraoral examination, there was presence of trigonocephaly, concave profile, maxillary retrognathism, malar deficiency [[Figure 1]b], shallow orbits, ocular proptosis and hypertelorism. Intraoral examination revealed Angle's class III molar relation with a negative overjet in the anterior tooth region [[Figure 1]c]. The dental arches were "U" shaped with bilateral posterior crossbite. Maxilla showed a high vault palate with lateral palatal swellings [[Figure 1]d, Chart ].[Additional file 1]

Radiographic examination revealed the presence of impacted teeth 13, 17, 23, 27 in panoramic radiograph [[Figure 1]e]. The lateral skull radiograph showed beaten metal appearance in the periphery [[Figure 1]f].
Figure 1 :(a) Frontal view of case 1 showing concave profile, ocular proptosis and hypertelorism
Figure 1b: Lateral profile of case 1 showing maxillary deficiency with relative mandibular prognathism
Figure 1c: Intraoral photograph of case 1 showing a negative overjet in the anterior region
Figure 1d: Photograph of case 1 showing high arched palate with lateral palatal swellings
Figure 1e: Orthopantomograph of case 1 showing impacted 17, 13, 23, and 27
Figure 1f: Lateral skull radiograph of case 1 showing beaten metal appearance at the periphery


Click here to view


Considering the family history, the patient's mother was also reviewed. On general examination, her gait and posture were normal and she was moderately nourished. On extraoral examination, she showed brachycephaly [[Figure 2]a], concave profile [[Figure 2]b], maxillary retrognathism [[Figure 2]c], decreased malar prominence, shallow orbits, ocular proptosis and hypertelorism. Intraoral examination revealed anterior open bite [[Figure 2]c], Angle's class III molar relation, crowding of the maxillary anterior teeth and lateral palatal swellings [[Figure 2]d]. Orthopantomograph revealed prominent gonial angles [[Figure 2]e]. Lateral skull showed characteristic copper beaten appearance [[Figure 2]f].
Figure 2 :(a) Frontal view of case 2 showing concave profile, ocular proptosis and hypertelorism
Figure 2b: Lateral profile of case 2 showing maxillary deficiency with relative mandibular prognathism
Figure 2c: Intraoral photograph of case 2 showing a negative overjet in the anterior region
Figure 2d: Photograph of case 2 showing high arched palate with lateral palatal swellings
Figure 2e: Orthopantomograph of case 2 showing prominent gonial angles
Figure 2f: Lateral skull radiograph of case 2 showing beaten metal appearance at the periphery


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The correct identification of a craniosynostosis syndrome necessitates an extensive physical and radiographic examination to detect all the associated anomalies. Craniosynostosis commonly begins during the first year of life and is usually completed by the age of 2-3 years. [6] Abnormalities of calvarial shape in Crouzon syndrome are dependent on the sutures involved. [4],[5],[6],[8] Premature fusion of synchondroses of cranial base, subsequent lack of bone growth perpendicular to the synchondroses and cranial base produces characteristic cranial shapes like brachycephaly, trigonocephaly, and scaphocephaly. The most severely affected patients can demonstrate a "clover leaf" skull (Kleeblatt schadel deformity). [4],[6],[8] In the cases reported above, the child had a trigonocephalic head and mother showed a brachycephalic head.

Exophthalmosis is stated to be a prerequisite for Crouzon syndrome [4],[5] and is said to be caused by a lack of forward sutural growth in the temporal and cranial base region. This produces a relative prominence of eyeball, which sometimes results in blindness due to increased intracranial pressure. [9] The cases reported above showed prominent exophthalmosis with normal vision.

Hypertelorism which was seen in our cases is a prominent finding in the affected individuals and is thought to arise due to decrease in growth of the sphenozygomatic and sphenotemporal sutures. [4]

In Crouzon syndrome, maxilla is hypoplastic, [4],[5] which causes relative mandibular prognathism. Underdevelopment of maxilla is most severe in premaxillary area, causing crowding in the maxillary anterior teeth region. Both of our cases showed these features.

Patients with Crouzon syndrome show a high vault palate, [4],[5] sometimes associated with lateral swellings. [2],[6] Both our cases showed these findings.

Cranial markings, a normal finding in growing individuals, are seen more prominently in patients with Crouzon syndrome because of increased intracranial pressure from the growing brain. [4],[5] These markings may be seen as multiple radiolucencies giving a beaten metal appearance [4],[5] in the periphery, which was classically seen in our case.

By the early recognition of the syndrome, the sutures can be guided before their fusion or artificial sutures can be placed to allow for the growth of brain. [7] Patients reporting after cessation of growth can be subjected to Le Fort III osteotomy to correct maxillary retrusion and associated hypoplasia of infraorbital and malar regions. Forward movement of infraorbital margin reduces the degree of proptosis. [10] Spectaclesplasty followed by a Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy at skeletal maturity also yields better esthetic results. [3] In our cases, the child was advised to go for surgical rapid maxillary expansion followed by Le Fort I osteotomy and his mother was advised to go for posterior segmental osteotomy followed by Le Fort I osteotomy to correct the dentofacial anomalies.

To conclude, Crouzon syndrome should be managed as early as possible as it results in poor cosmetic appearance and results in other complications like mental retardation, airway obstruction and decreased visual acuity as the age advances.

 
   References Top

1.Shaffer-Hine-Levy. Text book of oral pathology 5th ed. 2006. p. 985-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Pindborg: Syndromes of Head & Neck; 1976. p. 172-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Davis C, Lauritzen C. Spectacleplasty periorbital rotation advancement in Crouzon syndrome. J Craniofac surg 2008;19:652-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Singer SL, Walpole I, Brogan WF, Goldblatt J. Dentofacial features of a family with Crouzon Syndrome. Case reports. Aust Dent J 1997;42:11-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Pharaoh W. Oral radiology principles & interpretation. 5th ed. Mosby: Elsevier; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Gorlin RJ, Cohen NM Jr, Hennekam R. Syndromes of Head & Neck. 4th ed. 2001 p. 658-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Regezi, Sciubba, Jordan: Oral pathology, Clinical Pathologic Correlations. 4th ed. USA: Saunders, Elsevier; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Oral & Maxillofacial pathology. 2nd ed. Saunders: Elsevier; 2002. P. 40.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Worth HW. Principles and practice of Oral Radiologic Interpretation. Year Book Medical Publishers. Inc; 1963 p. 143-4.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Turvey TA, Long RE Jr, Hall DJ. Multidisciplinary management of Crouzon syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:205-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Case Report
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4482    
    Printed120    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded216    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal