Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 1331  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 



 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 237-242  

Effect of recasting of nickel-chromium alloy on its porosity


1 Department of Prosthodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune-400 041, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Prosthodontics, K.L.E Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Prosthodontics, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences and Research, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication1-Feb-2011

Correspondence Address:
Jayant Palaskar
Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune-400 041, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.76391

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Statement of Problem: As per the review of literature very few studies have been carried on recasting of dental casting alloy and in particlular its effect on occurrence of porosities. Purpose of Study: This study was designed to find out occurrence of porosities in new alloy and recasted alloy using a scanning electron microscope. Materials and Methods: Different percentage combinations of new and once casted alloy were used to produce twenty five samples. Castings obtained from new alloy were used as control group. All the samples were scanned under scanning electron mocroscope and photographs were taken from three specific sites for comparison. Results: There is no significant difference in occurrence of porosities in casting obtained by using new alloy and recasted alloy. Conclusion: With in the limitations of the study it is conducted that the prorosities will not be affected by recasting of neckel-chromium alloy. Clinical Implication: Porosities in dental casting alloy can alter physical and mechanical properties of the mental which inturn may lead to failure of crown and bridge, and also cast partial denture prosthesis.

Keywords: Base metal alloys, dental casting alloys, porosity, recasting


How to cite this article:
Palaskar J, Nadgir D V, Shah I. Effect of recasting of nickel-chromium alloy on its porosity. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1:237-42

How to cite this URL:
Palaskar J, Nadgir D V, Shah I. Effect of recasting of nickel-chromium alloy on its porosity. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Sep 24];1:237-42. Available from: http://www.contempclindent.org/text.asp?2010/1/4/237/76391


   Introduction Top


In our current economy, it is obligatory that dentists and technicians be cost conscious about the materials they use for fixed prosthesis. Cast gold alloy is in use since a long time as restorative materials in dentistry. The alloy's properties like resistance to tarnish and corrosion, hardness, strength, percentage elongation, castability, burnishability and capacity to take high polish have made it as an ideal restorative material. However, it has two main disadvantages: one is its highly distinguishable color and the other is high cost. The preferential use of the precious metal alloys like gold alloy has almost been eliminated by the elevated cost and resulted into subsequent demand for semiprecious and nonprecious base metal alloys in dental procedures. In 1930s, base metal alloys were introduced to dentistry by Eardle RW and Prange CH. [1] The properties of this alloy satisfy with that of gold alloy with the additional advantage of its reduced specific gravity and low cost. Due to this superiority over gold alloy, cobalt, chromium and nickel alloy and its allies have become immensely popular in the field of restorative dentistry. [2] This popularity of these alloys can be gauged by the varieties of the alloys available in the market. It is a point of commercial concern that the present demand for the base metal alloys has resulted in a substantial increase in the price of these once insignificant alloys.

Due to nobility of the contents of the gold alloys, it has been possible to recast the material again and again without losing any of its required properties. However, the same cannot be said about base metal alloys, due to lack of research work and literature available. Invariably, the manufacturers of base metal alloys instruct to use the alloy only once. Therefore, it will be of great advantage, both economically and environmentally, to recycle or to recast the alloy again and again with or without adding new alloy.

Very few references in dental literature are available regarding recasting of the base metal alloys. Few have tested the properties of the alloy by casting the used material and others have tested by adding new material to the casted alloy. It will be of definite scientific advantage if the properties of the recast alloys are studied in detail and directions given to prosthodontist and laboratory technicians.

Therefore, this study has been undertaken to find out the porosities in the new alloy, different percentage combinations of new alloy and once casted alloy and recasted alloy.


   Materials and Methods Top


Samples were casted using Whitlock's method. [3] Acrylic-wax mesh (Klett-O-flex, Renfert, Hilzingen, Germany) of dimensions 11 mm Χ 11 mm with 100 square shaped spaces of 1 mm Χ 1 mm and filament diameter of 0.3 mm was selected. Samples were casted by using nickel-chromium alloy (G-Soft, Dentaurum,Ispringen, Germany, with a chemical composition Ni 65%; Cr 27%; Mo 5%; Si 1.5%; other elements C, Mn, B less than 1%). For the first group of castings, totally new alloy was used, i.e., 100% new alloy; this group was designated as group A. The buttons of these castings from group A were separated from its sprue. These buttons were cut into different portions so as to mix it with new alloy by weight in proper proportions. In this study, the following groupings [Table 1] were made based on different combinations of new alloy and once casted alloy:
Table 1 :Different groups and its %combinations

Click here to view


Three samples from each group were selected randomly for the measurement of porosities. These selected samples were embedded in clear epoxy resin powder. Clear epoxy resin and formaldehyde were mixed in a ratio of 1:1 and poured into a standard mould over the samples and allowed to set. Three samples of the same group were embedded in one mould. Same procedure was followed for the other four groups. The embedded specimens were recovered and ground flat using belt emery grinding machine. It was then further smoothened with grade "0" and finished with grade "000" emery paper. Care was taken to produce uniform, scratch-free surface and to have a mirror finish. Final polishing was done on a motor driven revolving disk. The disk was covered with a velvet polishing cloth which was kept moist with slurry of various gradations of aluminium oxide powder. The specimens were cleaned with ethanol.

Embedded specimens were mounted on a metallurgical microscope (Invertoscope, LABO, Ambala, India) for evaluation of porosities in the sprue and runner bar region. [4] The porosity analysis was carried out by thorough scanning of sprue and runner bar under a magnification of 100Χ. Then, photographs were taken with SLR camera (Pantex, Tokyo, Japan) under 100Χ magnifications. But these photographs were not of a satisfactory quality. So, a repeat porosity study was carried out under scanning electron microscope (JEOL, JSM T330 A). The embedded specimens were removed from the embedding of epoxy resin material as this material was not accepted by scanning electron microscope [Figure 1].
Figure 1 :Photograph showing scanning electron micorsope

Click here to view


Then, all the samples were scanned thoroughly in the region of runner bars and the sprue, under scanning electron microscope. For comparison between different samples from different groups, three particulars sites from each group were selected. Those were two apex portions of two runner bars and the junction of two runner bars and the sprue. These sites were photographed and compared for analysis.


   Results Top


The results are shown in [Table 2],[Table 3],[Table 4],[Table 5],[Table 6]. On photographic comparison, porosities were seen in the one of the samples in group D [[Figure 5]d]. Every sample from group E exhibited porosities in one out of three sites. [[Figure 6]b, d]
Table 2 :Occurrence of porosity in group A

Click here to view
Table 3 :Occurrence of porosity in group B

Click here to view
Table 4 :Occurrence of porosity in group C

Click here to view
Table 5 :Occurrence of porosity in group D

Click here to view
Table 6 :Occurrence of porosity in group E

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The dental gold alloy contains all noble metals except copper. Sprues and buttons remaining after casting were used again for casting with addition of lost copper. Since 1930s, base metal alloys like cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) are in use as indirect restorative materials, as they were cost effective. In 1930s and 1940s, the cost of these base metal alloys was affordably low, so the sprues and buttons remaining after casting were discarded. However, at present, the cost of these base metal alloys has become very high. In spite of this, manufacturers give the instruction that alloy should be used only once for casting. Very few manufacturers advocate part addition of new alloy to the sprue and buttons for recasting. Apart from the cost due to environmental factors and deprivation of the resources, every material is being tried to reuse for various purposes. It is desired that the base metal alloy must also be reused for casting. Good restoration requires certain optimum properties. These properties should remain constant not only during various laboratory procedures but also in the oral environment. Therefore, it is very clear that recasting should not be done at the expense of the properties of the alloy.

Since 1962, studies regarding recasting of base metal alloys have been conducted by various researchers, namely, Harcourt, [5] Hesby, [6] Hong, [7] Nelson [4] and Presswood. [8] Mainly, they have studied properties of recast alloy, such as tensile strength, ultimate tensile strength, percentage elongation, modulus of elasticity, mean yield strength, microstructure and microhardness. However, as per the review of literature, there have been very few studies regarding the porosities in recasted nickel-chromium alloy. [4] Therefore, this study was undertaken to study porosities in the nickel-chromium alloy.

So far, the study on properties of recast alloy has been done either by casting the same alloy again and again up to 13 generations or by studying the properties of the castings with the addition of new allow to the recasted alloy in various proportions.

It is easy and scientific to compare the properties of the only new alloy, with various percentage combinations of new alloy and once casted alloy and with only recasted alloy. In this study, the following groups [Table 2] were made:

Perfect casting should be not only accurate but also free of porosities. Presence of porosities reduces the strength of the casting. [1],[4],[9],[10],[11] Hence, it is one of the criteria to study the change in the properties of the recasted alloy. As mentioned earlier, as per review of literature, only Nelson [4] has studied the porosities in recasted nickel-chromium alloy by using metallurgical microscope. In this study, embedded samples were mounted on a metallurgical microscope and photographs were obtained; but as the photographs obtained were not of satisfactory quality, the study was reconducted by using scanning electron microscope.

Porosities are always studied at the thickest portion of the castings and in the area which is farthest away from the junction of the sprue and the patterns. As the mesh filaments were very thin, it was not an ideal region to study the porosities. Hence, the farthest ends of the runner bar, i.e., the apex of the runner bars, the junction of the two runner bars and the sprue, were subjected for microscopic studies. These three particular sites were selected for photographic comparison between specimens of different groups.

All the microscopic photographs of the specimens from group A [[Figure 2]a, b, c], Group B [[Figure 3]a and b], Group c [[Figure 4]a and b] and Group E [[Figure 6]a and c] (indicate the absence of porosities in all the specimens except in one belonging to group D [[Figure 5]d]. It should be noted that even in group D, two samples did not show any porosities among the three samples observed. [[Figure 5]a, b and c].
Figure 2 :(a) Porosity free micrograph of apex of the runner bar (Group A)
Figure 2b: Porosity free micrograph of the junction of two runner bars and sprue (Group A)
Figure 2c: Porosity free micrograph of the apex of runner bar (Group A)


Click here to view
Figure 3 :(a) Porosity free micrograph of the junction of two runner bars and the sprue (Group B)
Figure 3b: Porosity free micrograph of the apex of the runner bar (Group B)


Click here to view
Figure 4 :(a) Porosity free Micrograph of the runner bar (Group C)
Figure 4b: Porosity free micrograph of the apex of runner bar (Group C)


Click here to view
Figure 5 :(a) Porosity free micrograph of the apex of runner bar (Group D)
Figure 5b: Porosity free micrograph of the apex of the runner bar (Group D)
Figure 5c: Porosity free micrograph of the juction of two runner bars and the sprue (Group D)
Figure 5d: Micrograph showing porosities (white dots) in the region just below the apex of runner bar (Grooup D)


Click here to view


In group E, all the three samples showed porosities at only one site in each sample, as shown in [[Figure 6]b and d] One sample out of three samples showed porosity at the one apex of the runner bar [[Figure 6]b], and in other two samples, porosities were seen in the sprue region of the sample [[Figure 6]d]. But it is to be noted that the micro-porosities were detected in small amounts. This finding is almost similar to the findings of Nelson [4] where microporosity was not readily apparent. But the occurrence of porosities in the sprue region [12],[13] is bound to take place and has been already proved.
Figure 6 :(a) Porosity free micrograph of the apex of runner bar (Group E)
Figure 6b: Micrograph of the apex of the runner bar showing porosity in the center (Group E)
Figure 6c: Porosity free micrograph of the junction of two runner bars and the sprue (Group E)
Figure 6d: Micrograph showing porosities (white dots) in the sprue region (Group E)


Click here to view


Based on this study it can be advocated that recasted alloy can be used at least once again. As per the studies of Harcourt, [5] recasting can be done up to 13th generation without losing any properties of the alloy.

It can also be advocated that completely cleaned and deoxidized casted alloy need not be added with new alloy in any proportion. This finding is of great significance in view of the cost involved and maintaining the level of available resources.


   Conclusion Top


  1. The porosity will not be affected by recasting the nickel-chromium alloy.
  2. It is not necessary to add new alloy in any proportion to the once casted alloy to minimize porosities in the alloy.
  3. We have studied only till the second generation of the recasted alloy. It is suggested to recast the alloy for a number of generations and study its effect on the properties of the alloy.


 
   References Top

1.Lewis AJ. The effect of the technique of metal fusion on the development of internal porosity in cast structures. Aust Dent J 1977;22:356-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Baran GR. The metallurgy of Ni-Cr alloys for fixed prosthodontics J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:639-50.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Whitlock R, Hinman R, Eden C, Tesk J, Dickson G, Parry E. A practical test to evaluate the castability of dental alloys. J Dent Res 1981;60:404.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Nelson DR, Palik JF, Morris RP, Comella MC. Recasting of a nickel-chromium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:122.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Harcourt HJ. The remelting of cobalt -chromium alloys. Br Dent J 1962;112:198-204.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Hesby DA, Kobes P, Garver DG, Pelleu GB. Physical properties of a repeatedly used non precious metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:291-3.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Hong JM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. The effect of recasting on the oxidation layer of a palladium-silver porcelain alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:420.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Presswood RG. Multiple recast of alloys for small castings. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:36-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Leinfelder KF, Fairthrust CW, Ryge G. Porosities in dental gold castings II Effects of mould temperature, sprue size and dimension of wax pattern. J Am Dent Assoc 1963;67:817-21.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Neilson J. Suck back porosity. Quintessence Dent Technol 1976;7:61-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Phillips RW. Skinner's science of Dental Materials. USA: W. B. Saunders Company; 1991.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Strickland WD, Sturdevent CM. Porosity in the full cast crown. J Am Dent Assoc 1959;58:69-78.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Vaidyanathan TK, Schulman A, Neilson JP, Shalita S. Correlation between macroscopic porosity location and liquid metal pressure in centrifugal casting technique. J Dent Res 1981;60:59.  Back to cited text no. 13
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1880    
    Printed113    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded175    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal